Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #27730
| From | pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router |
| Date | 2018-04-11 17:48 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <palans$b1h$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <pa851e$vtr$1@dont-email.me> |
Il 06/04/2018 17:51, pozz ha scritto: > I'm designing a electronic device running an embedded HTTP server. I'm > using lwip TCP/IP stack and the httpd application that comes with lwip. > > Because the device is under an ADSL router and the public IP is dynamic, > I need to register to a DDNS service, configure it in the router and > open one port (NAT). These steps are too tricky for the most of my users. > So I'm thinking to a simpler solution. > > I know I can create a cloud on the Internet that runs a standard HTTP > server to the users, and a custom "IOT" protocol to the remote devices. > However this way is too difficult for me and I have to change almost > everything that now works well. > > I'm thinking of a public HTTP tunnel that limits to forward the users > HTTP requests to the HTTP server. Of course, the tunnel is made by two > ends: one on the public server (and I could use everything, because I > have to start from zero), the other on the embedded device (where I have > many restrictions on memory size, computational power, no-OS and so on). > > Any experience on implementing a HTTP tunnel on lwip? What about reverse SSH tunnel? I think it is what I need. A public "relay" server runs a "standard" ssh server, so it will be very simple to delivery. On my device should be running a ssh client that creates, with an outgoing connection, a permanent SSH tunnel with the "relay" server. Now the end user can connect to the device by using the public "relay" server. I think it should work, even if I didn't test this configuration. However the only problem is to implement a simple SSH client on lwip device... I think it will be a very complex task. Anyway I don't need encryption provided by SSH... maybe a simple telnet tunnel should be sufficient. Is it possible?
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 17:51 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-04-07 07:47 -0700
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2018-04-08 12:42 +0300
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> - 2018-04-07 17:20 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 22:51 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 23:27 -0500
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 22:48 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-04-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-08 16:19 -0500
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-04-09 09:39 +1000
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 09:27 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-04-09 05:36 -0700
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 14:54 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-09 13:06 -0400
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 09:38 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-04-10 07:50 +1000
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-09 19:19 -0500
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2018-04-10 13:06 +1000
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-04-10 07:53 -0700
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-09 13:43 -0400
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2018-04-09 20:55 +0300
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 09:55 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> - 2018-04-10 14:33 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-04-10 08:20 -0700
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-12 17:19 -0400
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 17:48 +0200
Re: Plug&Play solution to reach an embedded HTTP server under a router Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2018-05-20 07:33 -0700
csiph-web