Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #680744

Re: Coaxial cable calculation

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/11/2018 6:23 AM, benj wrote:
> On 4/10/2018 6:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 4/10/2018 3:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2018 12:44 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 4/10/2018 11:32 AM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:21:42 +0200 (GMT+02:00), Libor Striz
>>>>> <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> Wrote in message:
>>>>>>> On 4/10/2018 1:42 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here's a question that stumped me back in the old slide rule days:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A coaxial cable, having an inner diameter of 0.0254mm (0.001") and
>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>> an insulator with a dielectric constant of 2.56, is yo have a
>>>>>>>> characteristic impedance of 2,000 Ohms. What must be the outer
>>>>>>>> conductor
>>>>>>>> diameter?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You guys can locate the appropriate method of calculation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> your question is malformed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    what is yo ?   don't  you mean Zo, which is normally used for
>>>>>>> characteristic impedance of coaxial cables ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what frequency or frequency band ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yo must mean you...
>>>>>
>>>>> Arcane symbol for admittance, the reciprocal of impedance.  Modern
>>>>> texts
>>>>> use sigma instead.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> double checking, usually that is Yo, and measured in siemens, not ohms.
>>>>
>>>> so still need a clarification Trevor, do you mean Yo 2000 siemens or Zo
>>>> 2000 Ohms ?
>>>>
>>>> and frequency band too, (there are places coax won't work)
>>>>
>>> Look at the science deniers squirm as they try to deny this typo!
>>> Clearly Yo is NOT admittance, since Trevor himself say "is yo have a
>>> characteristic impedance of 2,000 Ohms" He clearly used the word
>>> "impedance" not "admittance". Anyway if anyone here knew any actual
>>> practical science you'd know that a Zo of 1/2000 ohms gives a coax of
>>> ridiculous dimensions. Won't find one on your TV I'm sure.
>>>
>>> TREVOR MADE A TYPO and that proves he's uneducated, ignorant and insane!
>>> Neener, Neener, Neener!
>>>
>>
>> Initially I thought he meant "yo" like the urban "you", but that would
>> be a misspelling, and he would not recognize a misspelled word.
>>
>> at least he posted some physics/science stuff in here, so He gets a B.
> 
> Actually I smell engineering rather than science. I say C.
> For some reason engineers like to hang in Sci.physics pretending they
> are physicists arguing science.
> 
>> also, when did calculators replace slide rules, in college ?
> 
> Of course in the old days the way to demonstrate that you were nerdy
> beyond all belief was to have a slide rule case dangling from your belt
> in college. EeeW! Was like the coloring of a poisonous snake telling all
> hawt babes "don't touch"...unless you were there to bag a nerd with
> decent earning potential once graduated. But then came the HP35 and
> while Old man Hewlett insisted it fit a shirt pocket (actually was too
> long to fit nicely) suddenly the proper way to show nerdy class was now
> to have the leather HP35 pouch dangling from your belt. Given the price
> it did dual duty as a badge of nerdyness AND potential earning capacity.
> 
>> Extra Credit Question: anyone know what the term "lizard" means on
>> campus ? (think way-way back)
> 


yep, the engineers had Tails, the slide rule cases hanging off their belts.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 16:42 +1000
  Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 05:20 -0400
    Re: Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 19:33 +1000
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 15:28 -0400
        Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-11 08:36 -0500
          Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 14:38 -0400
            Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-11 13:55 -0500
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 15:45 -0400
    Re: Coaxial cable calculation Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-04-10 12:24 +0200
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 15:37 -0400
  Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 10:59 -0500
    Re: Coaxial cable calculation Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-04-10 18:21 +0200
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 11:32 -0500
        Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 11:44 -0500
          Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 16:03 -0400
            Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 17:18 -0500
              Re: Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-11 08:24 +1000
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 17:38 -0500
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-11 08:42 +1000
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 07:36 -0400
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-11 08:38 -0500
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 21:57 -0500
              Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 07:23 -0400
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-11 08:39 -0500
                Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-11 11:20 -0500
    Re: Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-11 05:48 +1000
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 16:10 -0400
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 17:30 -0500
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 21:57 -0500
    Re: Coaxial cable calculation benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 15:54 -0400
      Re: Coaxial cable calculation Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-11 06:01 +1000

csiph-web