Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #5447
| From | druck <news@druck.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Simple programming query |
| Date | 2018-04-09 21:05 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pagh2i$3bd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <56b9b38ce5Rick@bogus.email.address> <15b3f5f9-89fa-4b34-b9a2-8a7120fd2013@googlegroups.com> <56d2aabbb0Rick@bogus.email.address> <00be9224-9faa-44ce-a7ce-0ff5a2dc1629@googlegroups.com> <e857fee456.riscosfr@dfeugey.riscos.fr> |
On 07/04/2018 12:50, David Feugey wrote: > That's right. You have 256 colours, but based on a palette where you > fix only 16 significative ones. So it's true to say that only 16 > colours are freely selectable. But you'll get a gradiant of 256 real & > different colours. > > "the VIDC1a had 16 hardware palette registers. This meant that in > screen modes with sixteen colours or fewer, the colours could be > mapped to any of the 4096 available. However, in 256 colour modes, 4 > bits of the colour data were hardware derived and could not be > adjusted. The net result was 256 colours, but only 16 of them could be > assigned as desired, covering a range of the 4096 available colours." > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Archimedes That's not really a good description. Although the 16 pallet entries are used in 256 colour modes, they affect the bottom 4 bits of all colours in a completely un-useful way. The only sensible action is to accept the default palette of 64 base colours (4x4x4 RGB) with 16 tint (white levels) variations. > On the other hand, VIDC1 is really old technology The VIDC20's (and later) true 256 colour modes with 256 palette entries, is far more useful, you can do some great effects. ---druck
Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 03:05 -0800
Re: Simple programming query Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2018-01-11 12:11 +0000
Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 06:01 -0800
Re: Simple programming query jgh@mdfs.net - 2018-01-11 09:24 -0800
Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 10:15 -0800
Re: Simple programming query Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2018-01-12 21:24 +0000
Re: Simple programming query Rick Murray <Rick@bogus.email.address> - 2018-01-13 11:16 +0100
Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-03-01 23:09 -0800
Re: Simple programming query Rick Murray <Rick@bogus.email.address> - 2018-03-02 22:45 +0100
Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 00:38 -0700
Re: Simple programming query David Feugey <dfeugey@riscos.fr> - 2018-04-07 13:50 +0200
Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Simple programming query David Feugey <dfeugey@riscos.fr> - 2018-04-10 08:31 +0200
Re: Simple programming query druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2018-04-09 21:05 +0100
csiph-web