Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #5447

Re: Simple programming query

From druck <news@druck.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Subject Re: Simple programming query
Date 2018-04-09 21:05 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pagh2i$3bd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <56b9b38ce5Rick@bogus.email.address> <15b3f5f9-89fa-4b34-b9a2-8a7120fd2013@googlegroups.com> <56d2aabbb0Rick@bogus.email.address> <00be9224-9faa-44ce-a7ce-0ff5a2dc1629@googlegroups.com> <e857fee456.riscosfr@dfeugey.riscos.fr>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/04/2018 12:50, David Feugey wrote:
> That's right. You have 256 colours, but based on a palette where you
> fix only 16 significative ones. So it's true to say that only 16
> colours are freely selectable. But you'll get a gradiant of 256 real &
> different colours.
> 
> "the VIDC1a had 16 hardware palette registers. This meant that in
> screen modes with sixteen colours or fewer, the colours could be
> mapped to any of the 4096 available. However, in 256 colour modes, 4
> bits of the colour data were hardware derived and could not be
> adjusted. The net result was 256 colours, but only 16 of them could be
> assigned as desired, covering a range of the 4096 available colours."
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Archimedes

That's not really a good description. Although the 16 pallet entries are 
used in 256 colour modes, they affect the bottom 4 bits of all colours 
in a completely un-useful way.

The only sensible action is to accept the default palette of 64 base 
colours (4x4x4 RGB) with 16 tint (white levels) variations.

> On the other hand, VIDC1 is really old technology

The VIDC20's (and later) true 256 colour modes with 256 palette entries, 
is far more useful, you can do some great effects.

---druck

Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 03:05 -0800
  Re: Simple programming query Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2018-01-11 12:11 +0000
    Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 06:01 -0800
    Re: Simple programming query jgh@mdfs.net - 2018-01-11 09:24 -0800
      Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-01-11 10:15 -0800
        Re: Simple programming query Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2018-01-12 21:24 +0000
          Re: Simple programming query Rick Murray <Rick@bogus.email.address> - 2018-01-13 11:16 +0100
            Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-03-01 23:09 -0800
              Re: Simple programming query Rick Murray <Rick@bogus.email.address> - 2018-03-02 22:45 +0100
                Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 00:38 -0700
                Re: Simple programming query David Feugey <dfeugey@riscos.fr> - 2018-04-07 13:50 +0200
                Re: Simple programming query xltardy@gmail.com - 2018-04-09 11:40 -0700
                Re: Simple programming query David Feugey <dfeugey@riscos.fr> - 2018-04-10 08:31 +0200
                Re: Simple programming query druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2018-04-09 21:05 +0100

csiph-web