Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #680377

Re: Many smaller BHs

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Many smaller BHs
Date 2018-04-08 16:37 -0700
Organization n/a
Message-ID <pae936$dsj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <041af80e-03f8-483e-b86a-01cb0699247d@googlegroups.com> <pae3j8$gg5$1@dont-email.me> <c61dd0b2-12a0-487b-ae40-be2c6419c586@googlegroups.com> <pae88i$9tq$1@dont-email.me> <7bc3f924-8de8-4235-a067-8e281ee7e471@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/8/2018 4:28 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, April 8, 2018 at 4:23:01 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 3:18 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, April 8, 2018 at 3:03:23 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 4/8/2018 1:45 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, April 8, 2018 at 1:36:39 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> MM
>>>>>>> "Or more like lots of dead stellar corpses around the center. Like if the
>>>>>>> BH at the center has attracted lots of stuff over time. "
>>>>>>> But they splashed?
>>>>>>> Or the BH is full?
>>>>>>> Why didn't they fall in and disappear?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a wormhole that drains into a white hole "Hypernova"
>>>>> on the other side.
>>>>
>>>> Imvvho, there seems to be orbital characteristics that can actually
>>>> prevent things from being committed "into" the internals of a black hole.
>>>
>>> Do accretion discs become jets?
>>
>> The jets from, say a quasar, seem to be created from a hard core feeding
>> frenzy. The material from the the jets do not seem to be emanating from
>> "inside" the black hole.
> 
> The matter floats out at 90 degrees to the jets.
> Matter slows down in gravity. Light leaves
> gravity at its constant speed.
> How can matter defy maximum gravity if it
> always slows down at the maximum?

Are you trying to suggest that it slows down to the point where it is 
sort of "locked" in space time? This reminds me of an observer never 
being able to actually witness an object fully crossing an event horizon...


>>> How can matter be ejected from a black hole
>>> that came from an accretion disc when the
>>> two are at an angle?
>>
>> Some matter falls in, some does not.
> 
> What determines a stable orbit?

Sometimes, an object can find its way into a "sweet spot", or island of 
stability so to speak wrt its orbit and gravitational community? A 
satellite orbiting around a large source of gravity, say, the Earth?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Many smaller BHs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 15:39 -0700
  Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 15:50 -0700
    Re: Many smaller BHs Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 16:44 -0700
      Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 16:51 -0700
        Re: Many smaller BHs pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 19:42 -0700
          Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 20:18 -0700
            Re: Many smaller BHs pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
              Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 11:44 -0700
  Re: Many smaller BHs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-08 16:05 +0000
    Re: Many smaller BHs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 09:13 -0700
      Re: Many smaller BHs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-08 17:42 +0000
      Re: Many smaller BHs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:36 +0000
        Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 13:45 -0700
          Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 15:03 -0700
            Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 15:18 -0700
              Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 16:22 -0700
                Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 16:28 -0700
                Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 16:37 -0700
      Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 13:56 -0700
    Re: Many smaller BHs Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 12:51 -0700
  Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:40 -0700
    Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:44 -0700
    Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 12:46 -0700
      Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:55 -0700
        Re: Many smaller BHs mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-08 13:32 -0700
          Re: Many smaller BHs "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-08 16:28 -0700
  Re: Many smaller BHs Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-04-08 15:54 -0700

csiph-web