Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #447799
| From | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: amazon efficiency |
| Date | 2018-04-03 15:45 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy.com |
| Message-ID | <pa07j30140a@news1.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <f9a0b803.ubq@rooftop.invalid> |
On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:32:18 +0000, owl wrote: > > That facility > is 52 minutes from my house. > 52 minutes translates into about 100 miles round trip. Because most likely you are a suburban jackass that drives an SUV or pickup truck, that 100 miles will translate into about $25.00 of gasoline. What was the cost of the Amazon freight? But Amazon cannot necessarily be blamed. Their shipping contractors are responsible for the deliveries. It is not uncommon for packages to be stuck for weeks, months, or forever at a US Postal regional center and Amazon's suppliers use the USPS a lot. I ordered a product that became stuck for several weeks. After contacting the supplier I was sent a replacement product at no cost. Then, after about 2 months, the original shipment finally arrived. I got two products for the price of one. Another time I ordered a memory stick. The human packer at the distribution plant must have gotten distracted because he placed TWO memory sticks in the box. These were relatively expensive memory sticks. Did I do my proper civic duty and return the item that was sent to me by mistake? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
amazon efficiency owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:32 +0000
Clearly owl likes to blame other people, including Amazon, for the rodent's failures in life Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 07:46 -0700
Re: Clearly owl likes to blame other people, including Amazon, for the rodent's failures in life owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:11 +0000
Re: Clearly owl likes to blame other people, including Amazon, for the rodent's failures in life Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 19:57 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 08:05 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:18 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 08:25 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-03 11:03 -0400
Re: amazon efficiency owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-04 02:31 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-03 15:45 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-03 16:07 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-04 04:54 -0400
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-04 02:35 -0700
WalMart can't compete, its customers aren't as literate. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-03 08:53 -0700
Re: WalMart can't compete, its customers aren't as literate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-03 14:29 -0400
ASUS ROG AC5300 Router, Quad Core CPU, 8 LAN Ports. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-03 16:31 -0700
Re: ASUS ROG AC5300 Router, Quad Core CPU, 8 LAN Ports. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-03 23:33 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 15:46 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 09:17 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 11:53 -0500
Re: amazon efficiency RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 23:10 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 01:02 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-10 14:55 -0500
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 22:08 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-11 07:31 -0500
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 07:44 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-11 06:14 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-11 09:47 -0500
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 08:00 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-11 17:12 +0200
Re: amazon efficiency Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 08:19 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-11 09:07 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 09:29 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-11 09:45 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:05 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-11 11:41 -0500
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 09:50 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-11 09:54 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 02:40 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-12 05:32 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 05:48 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-11 17:10 +0000
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 09:19 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 06:28 -0700
Re: amazon efficiency Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 04:22 -0700
csiph-web