Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1193844

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation

From Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation
Date 2015-07-28 10:00 +0200
Message-ID <pR7XQ-2To-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pQSvL-5Qa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR2Ot-3ZZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR7Oa-2HP-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Cc'ing Rob as well..

On 28-07-15, 08:41, Lee Jones wrote:
> I have two issues with that.  Firstly, although the driver uses the
> OPP API (it also uses the Regulator and Clock API too), it is
> fundamentally a CPUFreq driver, so I think it should have a CPUFreq
> DT entry.  Secondly, if someone doesn't know the history of the
> ST CPUFreq set, they will look here for an accompanying document.  I
> personally wouldn't think to look in power/*opp* for a CPUFreq
> binding.
> 
> Perhaps, as all of the CPUFreq drivers use the OPP API, everything
> should be moved to drivers/base/power or drivers/power?

Okay, looks fine :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's  CPUFreq implementation Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's  CPUFreq implementation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 10:00 +0200

csiph-web