Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1193844
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation |
| Date | 2015-07-28 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pR7XQ-2To-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pQSvL-5Qa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR2Ot-3ZZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pR7Oa-2HP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cc'ing Rob as well.. On 28-07-15, 08:41, Lee Jones wrote: > I have two issues with that. Firstly, although the driver uses the > OPP API (it also uses the Regulator and Clock API too), it is > fundamentally a CPUFreq driver, so I think it should have a CPUFreq > DT entry. Secondly, if someone doesn't know the history of the > ST CPUFreq set, they will look here for an accompanying document. I > personally wouldn't think to look in power/*opp* for a CPUFreq > binding. > > Perhaps, as all of the CPUFreq drivers use the OPP API, everything > should be moved to drivers/base/power or drivers/power? Okay, looks fine :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-07-28 10:00 +0200
csiph-web