Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1189954

Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization contributions of dying tasks

From Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization contributions of dying tasks
Date 2015-07-22 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <pP2zf-8rx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pJFN0-Ef-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pJFN2-Ef-75@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOWau-7Gp-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:51:01PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:23:54PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > Tasks being dequeued for the last time (state == TASK_DEAD) are dequeued
> > with the DEQUEUE_SLEEP flag which causes their load and utilization
> > contributions to be added to the runqueue blocked load and utilization.
> > Hence they will contain load or utilization that is gone away. The issue
> > only exists for the root cfs_rq as cgroup_exit() doesn't set
> > DEQUEUE_SLEEP for task group exits.
> > 
> > If runnable+blocked load is to be used as a better estimate for cpu
> > load the dead task contributions need to be removed to prevent
> > load_balance() (idle_balance() in particular) from over-estimating the
> > cpu load.
> > 
> > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 775b0c7..fa12ce5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -3217,6 +3217,8 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> >  	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
> >  	 */
> >  	update_curr(cfs_rq);
> > +	if (entity_is_task(se) && task_of(se)->state == TASK_DEAD)
> > +		flags &= !DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
> 
> So flags will be set to zero? Could be replaced by "flags &= ~DEQUEUE_SLEEP"?

Not could, should :)

I meant to clear the flag, but used the wrong operator. We only have
DEQUEUE_SLEEP and 0 at the moment so it doesn't matter, but it might
later.

Thanks,
Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization  contributions of dying tasks Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2015-07-22 09:00 +0200
  Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization  contributions of dying tasks Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-07-22 15:50 +0200

csiph-web