Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1176572
| From | Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control |
| Date | 2015-07-03 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pI92O-xt-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pHMzf-39U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pHMIX-3df-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <pHN2i-3lz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Paolo,
On 07/02/2015 03:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 02/07/2015 15:17, Eric Auger wrote:
>> - new fields are added on producer side: linux irq, vfio_device handle,
>> active which reflects whether the source is active (at interrupt
>> controller level or at VFIO level - automasked -) and finally an
>> opaque pointer which will be used to point to the vfio_platform_device
>> in this series.
>
> Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you
> should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the
> vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead.
For this last one, I don't think this is achievable since if I store the
vfio_platform_irq in the opaque, it matches irqs[i] of
vfio_platform_device and I don't have any mean to retrieve "i" when
calling container_of.
struct vfio_platform_irq *irq =
container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer);
struct vfio_platform_device *vpdev =
container_of(irq, struct vfio_platform_device, irqs[i?]);
struct vfio_platform_device {
../..
struct vfio_platform_irq *irqs;
../..
}
So I think I still need to pass vfio_platform_device in the opaque and
look on irqs array to identify the right vfio_platform_irq *.
Do I miss sthg?
- Eric
>
> Once you've done this, embed the irq_bypass_producer struct in the
> vfio_platform_irq struct; in the new kvm_arch_* functions, go back to
> the vfio_platform_irq struct via container_of. From there you can
> retrieve pointers to the vfio_platform_device and the vfio_device.
>
>> - new fields on consumer side: the kvm handle, the gsi
>
> You do not need to add these. Instead, add the kvm handle to irqfd
> only. Like above, embed the irq_bypass_consumer struct in the irqfd
> struct; in the new kvm_arch_* functions, go back to the
> vfio_platform_irq struct via container_of.
>
> Paolo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 00/17] ARM IRQ forward control based on IRQ bypass manager Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:20 +0200
[RFC 02/17] VFIO: platform: single handler using function pointer Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:20 +0200
[RFC 01/17] VFIO: platform: test forwarded state when selecting IRQ handler Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:20 +0200
[RFC 13/17] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 13/17] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-07-02 15:50 +0200
[RFC 17/17] VFIO: platform: add irq bypass producer management Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 04/17] VFIO: pci: initialize vfio_device_external_ops Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 07/17] KVM: arm: rename pause into power_off Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 06/17] VFIO: add vfio_external_{mask|is_active|set_automasked} Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 09/17] bypass: IRQ bypass manager proto by Alex Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
RE: [RFC 09/17] bypass: IRQ bypass manager proto by Alex "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2015-07-03 04:20 +0200
[RFC 10/17] KVM: arm: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 16/17] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 16/17] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-07-02 15:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 16/17] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 16:00 +0200
[RFC 08/17] kvm: arm/arm64: implement kvm_arm_[halt,resume]_guest Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 14/17] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: forwarding control Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-07-02 15:50 +0200
RE: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2015-07-03 04:30 +0200
RE: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2015-07-03 04:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-03 15:20 +0200
RE: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2015-07-03 04:50 +0200
[RFC 05/17] VFIO: platform: implement vfio_device_external_ops callbacks Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
[RFC 11/17] VFIO: platform: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2015-07-02 15:30 +0200
csiph-web