Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #454294

Re: Dark Matter?

From	Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Dark Matter?
Date	2018-03-30 18:54 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<p9lq4m$seq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <293f4259-78e4-498c-85b5-eb634c671e0c@googlegroups.com> <9eaa3156-a699-497d-9309-1a85a5eb00a8@googlegroups.com> <3ebbf793-1f92-462b-912a-ae461fae707a@googlegroups.com> <p9l1mr$qgu$1@dont-email.me> <17484851-009c-49c2-a383-7cd847fcc2ad@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dne 30/03/2018 v 18:12 dlzc napsal(a):
> Dear Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž:
> 
> On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 2:57:49 AM UTC-7, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
>> Dne 29/03/2018 v 16:39 dlzc napsal(a):
>>> Dear Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog:
>>>
>>>> So Big Bang nucleosynthesis arguments predicting
>>>> the abundance of the chemical elements are completely
>>>> off the mark,
>>>
>>> [...]  BB nucleosythesis is tuned to expect what we see
>>> at-or-after the CMBR glow.
>>
>> Any evidence for such accusation ?
> 
> Any evidence to the contrary? 

The burden of evidence is on those who accuse.
If you said I have stolen 1 mill dollars,
it is not my duty to bring evidence I have not.

As I am not a nucleogenesis researcher,
claiming such primary results,
I have no duty to bring the primary evidence as they have.

They are available for those interested.
Those interested only in winning the argument do not care.

 It is easy to throw such challenge, without doing ANY research.  Have
you followed the logic chain?  Have you looked at the fine tuning
applied to arrive at "the abundance of the chemical elements", by
extrapolating into an unplumbable Big Bang event?

All is matter of a function y=f(x) and its inverse functions x=g(y).
Finding x for known y is not tuning f(x) to produce y.

> 
> That is the whole problem, pre-CMBR is inaccessible.  So we strain to make consistent images, and complain that if we change one part of our "painting", the rest is incomplete or covers too much.

It need not to be accessible.
> 
> So this started because I challenged the Dark Matter is unknown, not necessarily exotic.  That what we assumed to arrive at Dark Matter, here and now, makes our own solar system, mostly Dark Matter.

You can calculate expected mean density of regular and dark matter
in Solar system toward let say the Sun-Neptune mean distance.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.

Thread

Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-27 23:48 -0700
  Re:Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-28 14:47 +0200
    Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-28 07:34 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:29 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-28 14:35 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 04:18 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-29 07:39 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter? Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-03-30 11:57 +0200
                Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-30 09:12 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter? Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-03-30 18:54 +0200
                Re: Dark Matter? Will Bos <sllu@wsws.sb> - 2018-03-30 17:35 +0000
                Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-30 15:44 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-31 06:23 +0200
      Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 06:58 +0200
        Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-29 07:48 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter? Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-03-30 11:42 +0200
            Re: Dark Matter? dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2018-03-30 09:20 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter? Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-03-30 20:05 +0200
    Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-28 10:04 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-28 10:17 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:38 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-28 13:23 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-29 03:04 +0200
      Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 07:04 +0200
        Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-29 20:38 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-30 08:49 +0200
            Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-30 10:50 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-30 11:00 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-28 15:12 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-28 15:53 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 06:47 +0200
          Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-28 23:35 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 08:51 +0200
          Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-29 18:09 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-30 03:43 +0200
              Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-29 20:42 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 21:18 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 21:39 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-30 08:53 +0200
                Re: Dark Matter? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-03-30 10:30 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 06:46 +0200
    Re:Dark Matter? Will Bos <sllu@wsws.sb> - 2018-03-29 19:09 +0000
      Re:Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 21:21 +0200
        Re:Dark Matter? Will Bos <sllu@wsws.sb> - 2018-03-29 19:44 +0000
          Re:Dark Matter? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-29 21:54 +0200
        The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 13:09 -0700
          The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 13:22 -0700
            Re: The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-29 18:39 -0500
              Re: The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 17:13 -0700
                Re: The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 17:26 -0700
                Re: The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-29 20:08 -0700
          Re: The "dark" (UnSeen) side of the moon. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 18:04 -0400
            Most everything at WikiPedia is -WELL SOURCED-. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 16:10 -0700
  Re: Dark Matter? Will Bos <sllu@wsws.sb> - 2018-03-29 18:54 +0000
    Re: Dark Matter? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-03-29 21:27 +0200
  Re: Dark Matter? Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 08:09 +0100
  Dark Matter? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-30 19:16 -0700

csiph-web