Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #679129

Re: galaxy with no dark matter

Show all headers | View raw

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

<snip illogical fractal claim>

>Yes, I know you guys can't visualize Fractal,

Oh, I like playing with fractals. Mandelbrot sets, Julia sets, even ferns
and lots of fun stuff like that. Your claim I can't "visualize" fractals
is way wrong.

>and see empty Space, but our
>photons are too big for us to see smaller stuff. Which doesn't mean that
>smaller stuff isn't there. Space is FULL.

So again, for the zillionth time, why do you claim this is true? [crickets]

Wait, I know. You are a graduate of the Archimedes Plutonium School of
Physics and Math, where you believe "If I thought it up, it MUST be true!"
Correct? [crickets]

Only problem with that school is they don't teach you how to explain _why_
you believe what you do.  Archie P can't do that either, except to explain
one of his "If I thought it up, it MUST be true!" "proofs" by using one of
his earlier "If I thought it up, it MUST be true!" "proofs".

>So, I was trying to figure out how all this OTHER unseen and as yet
>unrecognized Matter out there might show up as it does.

Before you do that, you need to look for evidence that it even exists at
all.

> ALL of Space, no matter what size, should have the same density.

But it doesn't.

> If it doesn't, there's a reason.

Yes. So far, so good.

> The only reason can be SPIN.

And wham! Off into the weeds you go again.  A much better reason is that
your "theory" is quite simply WRONG.  Remember, "If I thought it up, it
MUST be true!" gets you exactly nowhere in science.

> Wherever more of the Space has stored spin energy, maybe?

Maybe not. No, make that definitely not.

>And now this limit on spinning disc galaxies of one billion years.

WRONG. Yet again.  It is the OUTERMOST EDGE of galaxies that seem to
have a revolution period of 1 billion years.  Using the numbers YOU
provided, the Sun takes about 205 million years to do so. That's because
the Sun is not on the outer edge.

Why do you INSIST on clinging onto a false interpretation like that?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

galaxy with no dark matter Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 21:40 -0500
  galaxy with no dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 05:42 -0700
    Re: galaxy with no dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-30 15:06 +0000
    Re: galaxy with no dark matter Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 23:49 -0500
      Re: galaxy with no dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 07:16 -0700
        Re: galaxy with no dark matter "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 13:07 -0700
          Re: galaxy with no dark matter "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-03-31 16:35 -0700
  galaxy with no dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 06:13 -0700
    Re: galaxy with no dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-30 15:30 +0000

csiph-web