Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275180

Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K stop your bickering)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:55:01 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:bjbpuah1bo3omq9kee3rt3e8abvd214qgf@4ax.com...
>>On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 16:15:30 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>>> What I can't understand is why the Russians, Chinese, Koreans etc tell
>>>>>> the whole world about these nukes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you explain that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait a few more months until China and Russia no longer use the US
>>>>> dollar as their base currency.
>>>>
>>>>     They don't do so now. China uses the Yuan Renminbi (often
>>>> refereed to simply as Renminbi. Russia uses the Ruble.
>>>>
>>>>> Then a lot will be coming out, as they won't lose any money over the
>>>>> theft and exposure of corruption the US now uses in it's day to day
>>>>> business affairs.
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't get rich from sending someone to jail that owes you money.
>>>>
>>>>     Maybe so, maybe no.
>>>>     If you can attach their assets you have a chance at it.
>>>
>>>You can't sue a country after you crash their economy, and the world knows 
>>>they don't have anything left.
>>
>>     Where do I, or anyone else, mention filing suit against a
>>country? I mentioned attaching assets, which, to the rational mind, is
>>not the same as filing a suit. YMMV, of course.
>>     And note that your claim was in regards to someone. That would be
>>a person, not a country.
>>     I understand you're not very smart, and I've made allowances for
>>your very low intellect, but you can't be as stupid as you're
>>presenting. This is an act, right?
>>
>>>Look at Greece, and Cypress
>>>Russia and China aren't stupid.
>>
>>     And they don't use the U.S. dollar as their base currency. While
>>I did get the common name of China's currency wrong (it's the Yuan),
>>the rest is spot on.
>>     Don't get mad that reality and your claims are in direct
>>opposition. At this point in your life you should be quite used to it.
>>
>>>They want to drain all the assets they can from the west,....before they 
>>>lower the boom.
>>
>>     Will that be with a base currency they don't use?
>>
>>>And the US sheeple just keep watching the talking heads on their TV's and 
>>>the Kardashians telling them that all is well,....the economy is doing 
>>>great.
>>
>>     The economy certainly could be better than it is now, but it's
>>not as bad as it's been in the past.
>>
>>>9/11 was caused by some boogie-men, that live under your bed.
>>
>>     I ceased believing in the "under the bed monster" when I was
>>four. Don't you think it's time you ceased believing in them as well?
>>
>>>No money ? Out of a job for over a year ?  Just use your credit cards, and 
>>>buy buy buy. 
>>
>>     I have plenty of money. In June I purchased a new car for cash.
>>No lien. True, it's a Kia Soul, so it's not a particularly expensive
>>car, but I still have no payments.
>>     I've had the same career for nearly 20 years. As far as I am
>>aware, there are no plans to change that. But maybe you know something
>>I don't?
>>     I admit use my AmEx frequently. Mostly for the Delta Air Miles. I
>>pay it off in full every month. But then AmEx doesn't have revolving
>>credit, so I would have to regardless of anything else.
>>     Wait. AmEx may have one card with revolving credit. Suddenly I'm
>>thinking they do, though I'm too lazy to verify. It doesn't apply to
>>me, so I lack any motivation to look.
>>     What will you offer next to prove you have no connection to
>>reality? Time will tell.
>
>K stop your bickering because if the real terrorist behind 9/11 were 
>international terrorist then nobody would want to go against them including 
>the people in charge of the inconsistent seismograph readings.  OK?

     There were no inconsistent readings. But you are free to prove
your LIE to be the truth.
     I'm waiting...

>
>What you really need to do is try and find out exactly what happens when a 
>150kt nuke is detonated in sold rock and then ask yourself why that 
>information is not easily accessible on the Internet.  <G>
>

     Since there were no nukes, a TRUTH you've helped to prove, I
don't think I could ever find out.
     Given the TRUTH that no nukes were used, there can be no
information about them anywhere. This means it can't be accessed
anywhere.

>I will state the following is a good read:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFZ8UcMgucY
>

     Um, Youtube hosts videos, stupid. And you expect people to accept
your delusions about 9/11?
     As you already KNOW, the people in the video are not wearing
radiation protection. Nothing they are wearing will add any protection
from nuclear radiation.
     The smocks will reduce or eliminate the risk of their clothing
getting dirty. They will do nothing to prevent nuclear radiation from
entering the body.
     The respirators will reduce or eliminate the risk of inhaling
asbestos dust and anything else in the air that could cause harm. They
are not going to prevent nuclear radiation from entering the body. 
     The ear plugs will reduce the decibel levels reaching their inner
ears. And with the machinery that was around, this would be a good
thing. But they will offer nothing in the way of protection from
nuclear radiation.
     Of course, you already know this, but your mental defect(s) will
never allow you to admit it.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
          Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
              Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
                Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K  is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
    Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000

csiph-web