Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #27654
| From | Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench |
| Date | 2018-02-20 20:58 +0100 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <p6hukc$142$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <87fu69etu1.fsf@nightsong.com> <p6h65j$fqq$1@solani.org> <062d7d94-2806-4f08-99b2-652a5d57da21@googlegroups.com> <p6h8c3$h4o$1@solani.org> <p6hb88$j84$1@solani.org> |
Am 20.02.2018 um 15:27 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: > Am 20.02.2018 um 14:38 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: >> >> 'Don't have one yet, but intend to do a Cortex-M3 and maybe a Z80 test >> later this week. At some point, I should also put a list of results on >> http://stdcbench.org/ >> >> Philipp >> > > Here is a Cortex-M4 (the STM32F302R8 at 64 Mhz - it could do 72 Mhz, but > not with the internal oscillator, and my board doesn't have a crystal), > using GCC -O2 -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb with newlib-nano: > > stdcbench 0.3 > stdcbench c90base score: 1693 > stdcbench c90lib score: 864 > stdcbench final score: 2557 > > Looks only 15% faster per clock cycle than the Cortex-M0. > > Philipp > And from the opposite end of the performance spectrum, a Cycpress EZ-USB FX2LP at 48 Mhz, compiled using SDCC 3.7.0 RC2, sdcc -mmcs51 --model-large --stack-auto --code-loc 0x0000 --code-size 0x3500 --xram-loc 0x3500 --xram-size 0x0b00 --opt-code-speed --max-allocs-per-node 10000: stdcbench 0.3 stdcbench c90base score: 12 stdcbench final score: 12 Philipp
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-07 16:49 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-02-08 22:36 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-09 20:48 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2018-02-10 01:26 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-10 18:47 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-02-10 21:32 +0200
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-10 20:40 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-20 14:00 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-02-20 05:13 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-20 14:38 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-20 15:27 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2018-02-20 07:14 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-20 17:30 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-03-05 19:59 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-20 20:58 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-02-20 23:37 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-21 09:29 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-21 11:01 +0100
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-02-20 21:37 +0200
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-02-20 23:42 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-02-10 22:48 -0800
Re: A new benchmark suitable for small systems: stdcbench Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-02-11 13:22 -0800
stdcbench STM8 compiler comparison Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-11 19:20 +0100
Re: stdcbench STM8 compiler comparison Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-02-11 23:29 +0000
Re: stdcbench STM8 compiler comparison Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2018-02-12 07:13 +0100
csiph-web