Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #126291
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? |
| Date | 2018-02-05 14:39 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p59mqa$psu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <uhLdC.698929$yM6.361778@fx26.am4> <lnlgg82vw2.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <NOMdC.1566374$OX.1165063@fx47.am4> <p59hg2$m76$1@dont-email.me> <zWYdC.6443$_V4.1675@fx16.iad> |
On 05/02/18 14:24, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/5/18 7:08 AM, David Brown wrote: >> MS made this decision at a time when 2-byte character sets were >> considered advanced and "international", and UCS-16 was enough for >> almost all purposes. Java, QT and Python that made the same decision. >> It turned out to be a bad idea in the end, and the *nix world got it >> right with utf-8 almost everywhere, and utf-32 where needed. Whether >> *nix got it right through laziness, luck or good planning is a matter of >> opinion. > > I do wonder if the difference was that in *nix land, everything was a > 'file', or more properly a stream of bytes. With this view, UTF-8 is a > natural encoding, as it is a byte stream. > > MSDOS/Windows much more thought of different sort of things and > different. Since one major use in windows of Unicode was filenames, and > the long filename into fixed size chunks, UCS-2 was a natural fit, so a > character wouldn't get split between chunks (this was part of keeping it > compatible with the older short 8.3 filenames). > > Unix on the other hand generally kept the filename all as one string, so > it wasn't a problem, and UTF-8 is generally more compact (or at least no > worse) for most names than UCS-2/UTF-16. That could well be part of it. In particular, DOS/Windows gives some meaning to parts of the file name - there are lots of characters that are disallowed, filenames that are reserved for special purposes (like "COM1" for a serial port - where *nix uses device nodes rather than file names), and of course it uses the extension to determine what to do with files. In the *nix world, the file name is just a string - only "/" and "\0" are special in any way. Supporting utf-8 rather than plain ASCII did not need any changes at all to most of *nix - it is only in user interaction that it is relevant. But DOS/Windows needs to be able to break up the filename in parts, and fixed size chunks makes that a lot easier.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 00:00 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-03 11:29 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 03:37 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-03 12:29 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 04:37 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-03 13:41 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 06:38 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-03 15:13 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-03 15:19 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 07:41 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-03 11:38 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-03 13:50 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-03 11:34 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-03 11:32 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-03 16:41 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 09:02 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 09:06 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-03 12:39 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-03 11:56 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-03 19:54 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-03 18:00 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 01:53 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 13:23 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 11:11 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 14:48 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 12:17 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-04 21:53 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 14:35 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-04 23:32 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-05 06:26 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-05 16:59 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-05 09:44 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-05 18:28 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-02-05 18:41 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-05 20:08 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-02-05 21:27 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-05 22:04 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2018-02-05 22:38 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-06 01:34 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 06:39 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-06 18:07 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 12:34 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-06 21:12 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 13:42 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 16:43 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 01:10 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-06 18:47 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-07 15:13 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-07 14:48 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-07 17:13 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-07 17:27 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-07 17:01 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-07 02:00 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-07 12:02 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-07 14:46 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 13:56 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 11:17 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-06 23:59 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-07 05:10 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 11:01 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-07 14:24 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-07 14:44 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 22:59 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-07 15:20 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 23:31 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-07 15:32 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-07 16:05 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-05 15:29 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 17:41 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-04 23:11 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-04 15:11 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-04 23:37 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-04 18:08 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 23:12 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-05 13:08 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-05 08:24 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-05 14:39 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-05 10:37 -0600
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-02-05 13:52 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-05 22:29 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-05 09:01 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-05 18:44 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-06 10:42 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-06 11:17 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-06 08:40 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-06 14:08 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-06 14:42 +0000
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-06 12:35 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-06 23:04 +0100
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 17:35 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 14:38 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 17:57 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 15:22 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Bart Smissaert <bart.smissaert@gmail.com> - 2018-02-04 12:19 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-02-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-03 13:38 -0800
Re: Count string in string with loop increase 2, why is this not faster? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2018-02-03 22:03 +0000
csiph-web