Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #480973
| From | jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir |
| Date | 2017-11-21 22:13 +0000 |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <ov28e4$5k7$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ov1et4$rg$1@reader2.panix.com> <e2af04d7-7005-4b4d-b69e-c48279276e74@googlegroups.com> <ov1p2p$6hl$1@reader2.panix.com> <06fbadf6-5607-4815-84bd-4f3f0d196449@googlegroups.com> |
In article <06fbadf6-5607-4815-84bd-4f3f0d196449@googlegroups.com>, Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 11:51:26 AM UTC-6, James Nicoll wrote: >> In article <e2af04d7-7005-4b4d-b69e-c48279276e74@googlegroups.com>, >> Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 8:57:44 AM UTC-6, James Nicoll wrote: >> >> Artemis by Andy Weir >> >> >> >> https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/the-criminal-kind >> > >> >Judging by the local library, it's pretty popular: > >> Welcome to my one man show, Nobody Cares Why You Hate Shakespeare, Leo. > >Okay, I guess. I didn't get the impression that you disliked the book >(although some quibbles), and my notes on the popularity at the library >weren't intended as a rebuttal. I didn't dislike it but I was a bit frustrated with how it could have been written 40 years ago. >I had just checked to see if they had any copies, and was surprised to >find out how many they had. Besides the 176 hardbacks and 43 ebooks, >there's also 15 large-print copies. Sometimes the large-print is a >stealth way to get the book faster. I .... never thought of that. Thanks! -- My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/ My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/ My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[review] Artemis by Andy Weir jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) - 2017-11-21 14:57 +0000
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-21 09:39 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) - 2017-11-21 17:51 +0000
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) - 2017-11-21 18:29 +0000
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-21 10:51 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) - 2017-11-21 22:13 +0000
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-21 15:32 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-11-22 23:52 -0700
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-24 10:37 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-12-30 13:19 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir D B Davis <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-01 18:21 +0000
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2017-11-22 18:41 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-24 10:46 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> - 2017-11-24 11:38 -0800
Re: [review] Artemis by Andy Weir mcdowell_ag@sky.com - 2017-12-30 22:35 -0800
csiph-web