Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #108001
| Date | 2012-05-19 19:44 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? |
| References | <exMtr.167357$JQ.57569@fx02.am4> <a1q0nqFjl3U1@mid.individual.net> <2RQtr.477893$y11.316125@fx21.am4> |
| Message-ID | <op2l89-pp.ln1@lazy.lzy> (permalink) |
| Organization | Arcor |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 05/19/2012 07:34 PM, 7 wrote: [...] > Virtual address space in a nut shell means program counter relative > operation. So if I were careful to keep supervisory > programs separate from user programs, and manage my address > space of user programs with PC relative addressing, > I won't need memory management hardware. All I need is a > fast program that keeps the virtual memory management functions > going because that should still be faster than setting up MMU > and managing its operations. Actually, that's more or less what Amiga was doing and many Real Time OSes. It is faster, also faster to crash, since programs could, -intentionally or unintentionally-, address memory which they should not. > So a cache could be implemented in software. And if done properly I doubt it is possible, unless the CPU supports such things, having, for example, some scratch pad RAM. Since cache is cache, i.e. fast but small memory, it has to be an hardware component. How this hardware is handled, is CPU dependent. bye, -- piergiorgio
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-05-19 13:40 +0100
Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Kulin <remailer@reece.net.au> - 2012-05-19 14:26 +0000
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2012-05-19 19:40 +0300
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-05-19 18:34 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2012-05-19 19:44 +0200
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-05-19 19:57 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2012-05-19 21:17 +0200
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-05-20 22:53 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-05-20 14:42 +0000
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-05-20 16:48 +0200
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> - 2012-05-20 22:19 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-05-20 22:55 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> - 2012-05-21 16:24 +0100
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-21 10:44 -0500
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2012-05-21 10:51 -0600
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2012-05-21 10:51 -0600
Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-21 12:53 -0400
csiph-web