Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #651357

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 02:47:55 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:cd5839ef-24ec-4978-950a-e042a152f8cb@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-8,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
>>>> Maybe you can explain it to all of us.  Hmm.  I wonder why it's
>>>> called a "point" and not a boiling distribution.  Hmm.
>
>>> That might be because it's the *point* where the evaporation processes
>>> gaseous pressure is sufficient to overcome atmospheric pressure, thus
>>> allowing boiling (bubble formation) to occur in the bulk of the
>>> liquid,
>
>> Reference?
>
> Does anyone find it strange that the kooktard James McGinn continually
> asks for proof of everything, even that which is common knowledge, yet
> has provided absolutely no evidence (let alone proof) that his kooky
> theory is anything other than the mad ranting of a badly damaged
> brain?

yes, i've noticed that you do that.

>
> <snicker>
>
> <http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/vappre.html>
> ===============================================================
> Evaporation vs Boiling
>
> Ordinary evaporation is a surface phenomenon - since the vapor
> pressure is low and since the pressure inside the liquid is equal to
> atmospheric pressure plus the liquid pressure, bubbles of water vapor
> cannot form. But at the boiling point, the saturated vapor pressure is
> equal to atmospheric pressure, bubbles form, and the vaporization
> becomes a volume phenomena.
> ===============================================================
>
> And yet again, the delusional uneducated oaf James McGinn has his
> kooky theory utterly demolished.
>
> Now, let's you get busy refuting all that peer-reviewed data which
> shreds your kooky theory, Jim...
>
> Jim, you're a kooktard who k'lames that stripping multiple molecules
> of water away from the surface of water via evaporation takes *less*
> energy than stripping away a single molecule because you're a
> low-information uneducated oaf who can't wrap your delusional
> Dunning-Kruger afflicted brain around the reality of physical
> processes.
>
> You further have demonstrated that you don't understand that when an
> inter-molecular H bond is broken, the other inter-molecular H bond
> isn't strengthened, the diametrically-opposed covalent bond to that
> broken inter-molecular H bond is preferentially strengthened:
>
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_hydrogen_bonding.html>
> "There is a trade-off between the covalent and hydrogen bond
> strengths; the stronger the H····O hydrogen bond, the weaker the O-H
> covalent bond, and the shorter the O····O distance"
>
> Note the graph... the covalent bond remains shorter (and stronger)
> than the inter-molecular H bond. Because the inter-molecular H bond is
> ~1/20th the strength of the covalent bond, the diametrically-opposite
> covalent bond will preferentially shorten and strengthen when one of
> the inter-molecular bonds is broken, Jim. That's why, when using high
> frequency AC to dissociate water, you target the short covalent bond
> frequency, as the long covalent bond frequency is too close to the H
> bond frequency, and if you break that, you strengthen the covalent
> bonds.
>
> You are *wrong*. Your kooky theory is *wrong*. The entire underlying
> premise of your kooky theory is fallacious. I've just destroyed your
> kooky theory, Jim. Now what will you do?
>
> Why do you continue cowardly snipping out and running away from that
> evidence which proves you're a moron who in actuality knows next to
> nothing about that which you're stupidly blathering about, Jim?
>
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html>
> "About a quarter of the water molecules each have a 'dangling' O-H
> group [415, 1613] pointing at a slight angle out of the water [594,
> 1261] whilst slightly more have 'dangling' acceptor electron positions
> [2334] similar to water-hydrophobe surfaces, creating a slight
> negative charge on the surface."
>
> What's that say, you moron? Just how do you think evaporation occurs
> in the first place? The surface potential of water is negative. The
> electric potential of air is positive. This, combined with random
> thermal vibrations in the bulk water, causes individual water
> molecules to be electrically attached to the air. Reference Feynman
> Lectures on Physics, Electricity In The Atmosphere, 1964.
>
> <http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_09.html>
> <http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/img/FLP_II/f09-01/f09-01_tc_iPad_big_a.svgz>
>
> You're wrong, Jim. Your entire kooky theory is wrong, Jim. I've
> destroyed the central premise of your kooky theory, thereby proving
> that both you *and* your kooky theory are wrong, Jim.
>
> That'd be because you're an uneducated moron suffering from delusions,
> combined with Dunning-Kruger causing you to believe you can never be
> wrong. Take your meds, Jim.
>
> Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
> <http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation>
> =================================================
> A water molecule is typically tied to three or four other molecules in
> the liquid through strong hydrogen bonds. At the surface, this number
> is reduced, and in order to evaporate the molecule must break at least
> one hydrogen bond. However, this requires substantial energy, and the
> obvious question is: "How do evaporating water molecules gain
> sufficient energy to break the strong hydrogen bond?" To answer this,
> the researchers watched molecules evaporate in their molecular movies,
> and inspected the evaporating molecules' trajectories. They found that
> an ejected molecule always gains its kinetic energy through a precise
> interaction with two other molecules. It always had a violent
> collision with a fast-moving molecule just prior to leaving the
> liquid. This fast-moving molecule, further study showed, was
> interacting strongly with a third molecule, femtoseconds prior to the
> evaporation process, in a way that was crucial to the evaporation
> process. As such, the evaporation process can be viewed as a Newton's
> cradle, where momentum is transferred to the surface from below, in a
> well-timed manner, to kick off one water molecule.
> =================================================
>
> "one water molecule", Jim. Evaporation is a molecule-by-molecule
> process, meaning that water in its gaseous phase is entering the
> atmosphere, meaning water in its gaseous phase is in the atmosphere,
> meaning your kooky challenge has been met and the proof has been
> provided, meaning the underlying premise of your kooky theory has been
> utterly destroyed, meaning you  owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay,
> Jim.
>
> <snicker>
>
> Whooopsie... *another* peer-reviewed study proving monomer gaseous
> water exists in the atmosphere:
> <http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/>
> =========================================================
> Superimposed on the water monomer absorption, a water continuum
> absorption has long been recognized, but its true nature still remains
> controversial.
> =========================================================
>
> That not only meets the terms of your kooky challenge (again), Jim,
> thereby triggering your paying me that offered $100,000 which you
> promised in a publicly announced and therefore legally binding
> challenge, but it utterly destroys your kooky theory *and* proves
> you're a moronic kooktard, Jim.
>
> <snicker>
>


-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

 

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:07 +0100
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:47 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 03:05 -0500
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:37 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 20:00 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 08:54 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 18:40 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:09 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:23 +0100
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland madeforzyngagames@yahoo.com - 2016-03-09 15:35 -0800

csiph-web