Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #33990
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search |
| Date | 2014-10-17 20:30 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.xnwg0gx1mk81un@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <e75b148a-60e8-4bd5-9544-634e88b849c3@googlegroups.com> <0e6dna-zwvcdVKfJnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.xnue6gpemk81un@localhost> <9sCdnTcocuD0093JnZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <GNKdnULWhZqxR93JnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 04:58:20 -0400, Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: > Elizabeth D. Rather <erather@forth.com> wrote: >> On 10/16/14 11:55 AM, Rod Pemberton wrote: >>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 14:33:37 -0400, Elizabeth D. Rather >>> <erather@forth.com> wrote: >>>> The requirement (from Forth 2000X) is "When searching a word list for >>>> a definition name, the system shall search each word list from its >>>> last definition to its first." There is no restriction on how the >>>> dictionary is organized or searched, providing that the most recent >>>> definition of a word will be found in preference to any prior >>>> definition that may exist in the current search order. >>> >>> Unfortunately, requiring that the most recent definition of a word to >>> be >>> found requires that the order of *all* other words be preserved in time >>> order they were defined. >> >> That is correct. However, 40 years of use has found this not in the >> least "unfortunate" but rather an asset that most users depend upon. > > Actually not: it only requires that identically-named words be > preserved in the order they were defined. Otherwise, hashed > dictionaries could not work. > Are you saying it's valid to change this defining order? : TODO 1 . ; : FIXME TODO ; : HELP1 FIXME ; : TODO 2 . ; : FIXME TODO ; : HELP2 FIXME ; E.g., to this order? : TODO 1 . ; : TODO 2 . ; : FIXME TODO ; : FIXME TODO ; : HELP1 FIXME ; : HELP2 FIXME ; That has the identically-named words preserved in the order they were defined, which is what you just stated. Clearly, this doesn't and wouldn't ever work correctly. RP> So, my I think my earlier question remains valid. How do you RP> intend to keep HELP1 and HELP2 emitting the correct integer RP> _without_ also preserving the exact time ordered list of RP> definitions for TODO and FIXME ? Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2014-10-11 08:52 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-11 08:06 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2014-10-12 02:46 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-12 08:33 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 17:55 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-16 13:02 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-10-17 03:58 -0500
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-17 07:39 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-17 20:30 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-17 14:39 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-17 21:33 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-17 21:51 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-18 13:51 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search dwarman@davidwarman.net - 2014-10-17 08:38 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 17:54 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-17 19:33 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-11 22:39 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2014-10-12 02:50 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-12 08:38 -1000
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-11 15:05 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-12 12:14 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2014-10-12 10:06 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-12 15:50 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-13 01:02 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search jfong@ms4.hinet.net - 2014-10-12 21:11 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-12 22:01 -0700
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-14 02:06 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 18:11 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-17 11:38 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 18:06 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-17 11:38 +0200
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 18:04 -0400
Re: Just an idea : B-tree on-disk storage of FORTH dictrionary words for fast indexing and search "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-16 17:53 -0400
csiph-web