Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #11503

Re: STL vector

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:30:14 +0100, Marcel Müller  
<news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> wrote:

> On 15.11.2011 20:50, Peter Liedermann wrote:
>> Let "Jumbo" be the name of a class whose instances consume substantial
>> storage.
>>
>> A vector of typically 1000 such Jumbo-instances is needed. It must be
>> sorted by a simple int criterium, but not often.
>>
>> Is there a substantial performance difference between vector <Jumbo> and
>> vector <Jumbo *>, provided that everything else is adapted accordingly?
>> Is there a difference at all?
>
> In general you need to copy the Jumbo objects to put them into the  
> vector. The copy constructor of Jumbo might be quite expensive if it is  
> not a POD like type. Is that what you want?

I think this is the key to my question: Jumbo * is a POD type and Jumbo  
itself is clearly not.  For illustration of the term POD, I found
http://www.fnal.gov/docs/working-groups/fpcltf/Pkg/ISOcxx/doc/POD.html
useful.


> You should also think about the (re)allocations of vector<Jumbo>. A  
> vector will in general allocate more slots than needed. If Jumbo is  
> large, then this might be a reasonable amount of memory. Furthermore, a  
> vector might not start with it's final size. So there are some  
> reallocations necessary before the vector has it's final size. These  
> reallocations copy the entire content.

Since I am now determined to use Jumbo * and can exactly predict the  
number of slots, this is not relevant to my situation although generally  
good to know.  Question: If I would use vector <Jumbo> instead and the  
Jumbo objects were of varying length and I would start the vector with all  
NUL entries, could I then get the reallocation/copy problem mentioned?


> Personally I would prefer vector<intrusive_ptr<Jumbo>> or some other  
> smart pointer over vector<Jumbo*>, because it answers the ownership  
> question more clearly. However, details depend on your application.
>

Thank you for this suggestion.  I will practice the use of the mentioned  
smart pointers at a good opportunity.  At the present project, though, I  
will use vector <Jumbo*> because ownership is out opf qustion and it is  
not the time to risk anything new.

Thanx,
Peter

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

STL vector "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-15 20:50 +0100
  Re: STL vector Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-11-15 21:30 +0100
    Re: STL vector Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-11-15 21:13 +0000
      Re: STL vector Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-11-15 22:46 +0100
        Re: STL vector Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-11-15 22:02 +0000
          Re: STL vector / Heap fragmentation "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-16 09:02 +0100
            Re: STL vector / Heap fragmentation Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 00:39 -0800
              Re: STL vector / Heap fragmentation "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-16 10:58 +0100
                Re: STL vector / Heap fragmentation Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 04:12 -0800
    Re: STL vector "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-16 08:55 +0100
      Re: STL vector yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2011-11-16 16:54 +0000
      Re: STL vector Joe Gottman <josephgottman@comcast.net> - 2011-11-16 18:22 -0500
  Re: STL vector Joe Gottman <josephgottman@comcast.net> - 2011-11-15 21:59 -0500
    Re: STL vector "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-16 08:58 +0100
  Re: STL vector Werner <werasm@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 05:53 -0800
  Re: STL vector Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-11-16 14:02 +0000
    Re: STL vector Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-11-16 14:05 +0000
    Re: STL vector "Peter Liedermann" <peter09876@hispeed.ch> - 2011-11-17 16:45 +0100
      Re: STL vector Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-11-17 16:19 +0000
      Re: STL vector Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 15:19 -0800

csiph-web