Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.politics > #762615

Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote

>>>>>>>> let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers

>>>>>>> And you like most listened to her speech?

>>>>>> I did and that's what she said

>>>>> I heard her say
>>>>> "Fit in or fuck off"

>>>> She never said anything like that even using different words

>>> So you watched (if you did at all) on ABC

>> Yep, watched it on iView

> As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference
> https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
>   Pauline Hanson Monoculture

She has since rabbited on about it elsewhere as well

> How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of Australia

Bullshit it ever did

> By redefining Religion by talking around it.

No religion was ever redefined and multiculture
has always been around LONG before there was
ever any federal constitution or any High Court

> Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
> Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
> (Vic) HCA 40)—a tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
> broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".

Irrelevant to multiculturalism, that was JUST making it clear
what the court believed that the tax law applied to and didn't
refine religion at all

> Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian
> population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
> (Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).

Mindless bullshit the jews, chinese, afghans, abos. sikhs etc

> Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth";

And S116 says the exact opposite

> non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).

> Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid Sunday
> laws debates.

Bullshit it did anything of the sort

> Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fi
> cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"—no supernatural
> Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.

More mindless bullshit given the real meaning of that word
which includes some belief in some supernatural being and
obviously included a hell of a lot more than just christianity

> Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as
> business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.

Irrelevant to the real meaning of religion which includes
some belief in some supernatural  being and obviously
includes a hell of a lot more than just christianity

And some religions don't even include any belief in some
supernatural being

> How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,
> Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
> Adopted functional test—belief in supernatural Being/Principle +
> acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
> unprotected).

> Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,
> rituals.

> Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
> charities, s116.

All irrelevant to multiculturalism

> Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding
> intent lock-in—words evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to
> non-theistic beliefs).

> No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendment—text
> unchanged, just broader scope.

<reams of crap irrelevant to multiculturalism flushed where it belongs>

Back to aus.politics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2026-06-28 11:33 +0200
  Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 08:33 +1000
    Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 08:44 +1000
      Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 09:22 +1000
        Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 09:47 +1000
          Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 10:30 +1000
            Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 10:40 +1000
              Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 12:03 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 14:29 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 15:01 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 17:33 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 08:00 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> - 2026-06-30 00:21 +0200
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 10:46 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> - 2026-06-30 03:01 +0200
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-06-30 19:36 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Oped <oped@usenet.example> - 2026-06-29 15:46 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 16:55 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 17:58 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 08:00 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 17:38 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Oped <oped@usenet.example> - 2026-06-29 15:51 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Oped <oped@usenet.example> - 2026-06-30 13:07 +1000
                Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 16:29 +1000
    Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2026-06-29 11:07 +1000
      Re: Pauline is down in polls after Press Club rant "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 14:11 +1000

csiph-web