Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #430535

Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered

From Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered
Date 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000
Organization Bídníkùm Laterá Institute
Message-ID <oo8he0$ul2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <onu3mh$1190$1@gioia.aioe.org> <db86c365-c830-4243-af48-f5404ac5a3bd@googlegroups.com> <oo89h9$if4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1a594d50-0fad-40b0-b99a-10a306b23b9b@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


JanPB wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 11:15:09 PM UTC-7, Bídníkùm Laterá
> wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>> 
>> > On Sunday, August 27, 2017 at 2:34:13 AM UTC-7, Bídníkùm Laterá
>> > wrote:
>> >> Without further redo, they are proclaiming, that my Divergent Matter
>> >> of the Moving Bodies Model would be inconsistent, since it can't
>> >> EXPLAIN Tidal Forces - otherwise extremely correct (my theory).
>> >> However, they willingly forget their own theory, Relativity, is
>> >> incapable when it comes to the above Tidal Forces. It can't explain
>> >> it,
>> >> since the curvature is about the observers geometrical projections
>> >> and nothing else.
>> > 
>> > Not even wrong. Nonsense.
>> 
>> For the incompetent and uninitiated, absolutely.
> 
> No. What YOU wrote is pure gobbledygook. Sorry.

aHmmm?? At your age you didn't find out that your curvature is nothen but 
a geometrical projection, a visual since you insist.

Nevermind this nonsense, just explain it, in your severely restricted 
vocabulary, the Tidal Forces in Relativity, by using that BIG, FAT tensor 
populated GR one. You may abuse your fingers and your toes in doing that. 
You can't do it. Beyond your "gobbledygook" you can't accomplish anything 
in Mathematics. I see no proofs around me.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:34 +0000
  Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:44 +0000
    Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-27 22:09 +1000
      Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 15:20 +0000
        Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-28 14:38 +1000
          Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-28 19:04 +0000
            Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 14:46 +1000
              Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 09:28 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 22:07 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 16:36 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 10:18 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:17 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-31 17:10 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-08-31 02:11 -0500
  Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:12 -0700
    Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:15 +0000
      Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 00:45 -0700
        Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000
          Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 12:29 -0700
            Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-02 11:37 +0000
              Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-03 11:21 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-03 10:58 +0000
              Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 22:08 -0700
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-03 10:58 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:16 -0700
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-04 22:47 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-03 22:12 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:18 -0700
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-04 05:54 -0700
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-05 12:19 +0000

csiph-web