Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #430535
| From | Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered |
| Date | 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000 |
| Organization | Bídníkùm Laterá Institute |
| Message-ID | <oo8he0$ul2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <onu3mh$1190$1@gioia.aioe.org> <db86c365-c830-4243-af48-f5404ac5a3bd@googlegroups.com> <oo89h9$if4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1a594d50-0fad-40b0-b99a-10a306b23b9b@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
JanPB wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 11:15:09 PM UTC-7, Bídníkùm Laterá > wrote: >> JanPB wrote: >> >> > On Sunday, August 27, 2017 at 2:34:13 AM UTC-7, Bídníkùm Laterá >> > wrote: >> >> Without further redo, they are proclaiming, that my Divergent Matter >> >> of the Moving Bodies Model would be inconsistent, since it can't >> >> EXPLAIN Tidal Forces - otherwise extremely correct (my theory). >> >> However, they willingly forget their own theory, Relativity, is >> >> incapable when it comes to the above Tidal Forces. It can't explain >> >> it, >> >> since the curvature is about the observers geometrical projections >> >> and nothing else. >> > >> > Not even wrong. Nonsense. >> >> For the incompetent and uninitiated, absolutely. > > No. What YOU wrote is pure gobbledygook. Sorry. aHmmm?? At your age you didn't find out that your curvature is nothen but a geometrical projection, a visual since you insist. Nevermind this nonsense, just explain it, in your severely restricted vocabulary, the Tidal Forces in Relativity, by using that BIG, FAT tensor populated GR one. You may abuse your fingers and your toes in doing that. You can't do it. Beyond your "gobbledygook" you can't accomplish anything in Mathematics. I see no proofs around me.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:34 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:44 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-27 22:09 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 15:20 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-28 14:38 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-28 19:04 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 14:46 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 09:28 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 22:07 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 10:18 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:17 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-31 17:10 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-08-31 02:11 -0500
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:12 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:15 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 00:45 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 12:29 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-02 11:37 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-03 11:21 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 22:08 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-09-03 10:58 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:16 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-04 22:47 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-03 22:12 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:18 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-04 05:54 -0700
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-05 12:19 +0000
csiph-web