Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #646250
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why is there something? |
| Date | 2017-08-17 02:28 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <on2uvt$351$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <5993a193$0$61900$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <on0egd$fp4$4@gioia.aioe.org> <5994adc6$0$57277$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <on2q35$1tkb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5994f748$0$17407$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 8/16/2017 9:04 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 8/15/2017 11:34 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 8/15/2017 8:54 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 9:36:17 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2017 10:06 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:45:00 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/17 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 10:38:24 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:06:42 PM UTC+10, alal...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 4:35:50 AM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there a reason you believe what you do? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may be lazy, but I am not a liar. Over time, perhaps you will learn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to trust me. How solid is the evidence you have seen on quarks? How >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliant are you on other people? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Writer & Investor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any theory worth anything must make valid predictions if that theory is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be considered scientific. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the theory of quarks does, many times over, verified in experiment >>>>>>>>>>>>> many times over. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Really. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jet production in lepton and hadron colliders. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mumbo-jumbo. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not mumbo-jumbo. It's perfectly understandable, even to lay >>>>>>>>>>> readers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If it is perfectly understandable to lay readers then explain it in a few lines. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry Banjo, But Odd doesn't do explanations. He just tells people to go >>>>>>>>> look it up in some book. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because for explanations that take 40 or 50 pages, it makes sense to find >>>>>>>> them in a book, not on usenet. Obviously. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> obviously such explanations are not explanations but obfuscations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seriously? You can't read 40-50 pages without getting confused? >>>>>> Your attention span is 30 min? >>>>> >>>>> Hey Boinker, nobody who isn't insane can read 40-50 pages of "modern" >>>>> physics without being confused. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Speak for yourself, Ben, it's not that complicated. >>>> Sour grapes? >>>> >>> Try to explain "probability waves in nothing at all" to us again.... >>> >> >> Why? That's a phrase you made up. >> > It is a phrase that EXACTLY describes what physics believes is reality. No. It's a phrase that you made up and is inaccurate. It is fabricated propaganda by you. > You argue it all the time. What is the significance of Quantum > wavefunctions? I'm sure this is over your head but the wavefuntions > times their complex conjugate gives the probability density of finding > reality! Do you not agree? Of course you do. So if these are waves (by > YOUR made up definition of obeying the wave equation) and their > significance is probability density, then they are obviously > "probability waves". You agree? And finally we must ask then what is the > "medium" for general "probability waves". In truth nobody has the > slightest clue what in hell a "probability wave" is, but nevertheless > they (you) strongly assert and believe that these waves do not propagate > in the aether. In fact you deny aether exists! You say it is a fantasy. Fine up to here > There is nothing there at all! Is this not correct? Of course I'm right. Nope. False dichotomy. Your propaganda is a false choice between aether and nothing at all. Sorry, dude, not the only options. Dipshit. > > So my phrase is obviously a CLEAR description of what you truly believe > and promote as physics. Can you deny it without lying? Didn't think so. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 09:45 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Why is there something? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-19 00:11 -0700
Re: Why is there something? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Why is there something? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-13 14:07 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-14 11:46 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 11:45 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 13:17 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-15 13:48 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:33 -0700
Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 16:21 -0500
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:05 -0500
Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-14 00:06 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 11:33 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:00 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 12:38 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:42 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 06:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 08:44 -0500
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:06 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 13:00 -0500
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 17:55 -0400
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:17 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 23:36 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:38 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 00:54 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:36 -0400
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:40 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 21:54 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 02:28 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-17 17:24 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:34 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-15 21:25 -0500
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:38 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 08:14 -0700
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:24 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-14 07:45 -0500
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:28 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:04 -0500
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 17:25 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 21:02 -0500
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-14 07:17 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:13 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 18:00 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 15:38 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 19:29 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:37 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:41 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:41 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:33 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:53 -0700
Re: Why is there something? KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-13 17:36 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-14 10:02 +0000
Re: Why is there something? "Anthony Zen Pride Week" <sender@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-16 07:13 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 07:29 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 17:30 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 20:42 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-17 22:49 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 08:14 -0700
csiph-web