Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #428526
| From | Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The overpass |
| Date | 2017-08-13 19:07 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <omq0vm$10f2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <omp0d9$1gbi$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ws-dnVPmJb5vwQ3EnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Tom Roberts alle ore 16:06:41 del 13/08/2017 ha scritto: >> On the overpass C the head A of the train AB encounters the head N of the >> train MN traveling in the opposite direction: >> -------------M------->N------------------------ >> ----------------------C---------------------->x >> ----------------------A<-------B--------------- >> >> Since the two trains have the same length and speed, in the land reference >> also the tail B of the train AB encounters the queue M of the train MN on >> the same overpass C: >> ----------------------M------->N--------------- >> ----------------------C---------------------->x >> -------------A<-------B------------------------ >> >> At that point, from the tail of both trains a bomb destroys the flyover but >> the trains are now gone and so they are safe. > > OK. That describes the physical situation. ALL reference frames will agree > that A and N reach C simultaneously, and all frames agree that B and N reach > C simultaneously, and the overpass is destroyed after both train are gone. > > Simultaneous happenings that occur at a single event in spacetime are > simultaneous in all frames. Here there are two separate events: A and N reach > C, and M and B reach C -- these two events have timelike separation and > therefore their order is independent of frame. > > It is only for spacelike-separated events that their order is frame > dependent. There are no such events here. > > Tom Roberts Ok, grazie, bye Luigi Fortunati -- Luigi Fortunati Credere e' piu' facile che pensare Believing is easier than thinking
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The overpass LuigiFortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 09:51 +0200
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-13 15:53 +0200
Re: The overpass Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 19:13 +0200
Re: The overpass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:02 -0700
Re: The overpass Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-13 09:06 -0500
Re: The overpass Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 19:07 +0200
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-13 19:40 +0200
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-13 21:32 +0200
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-13 21:45 +0200
Re: The overpass Prudence Oppenheimer <phow@innfldo.sp> - 2017-08-13 21:32 +0000
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-14 00:34 +0200
Re: The overpass Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-13 23:03 -0500
Re: The overpass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-14 15:52 +0200
Re: The overpass Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-14 15:21 -0500
Re: The overpass Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-14 16:43 -0500
Re: The overpass "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 17:14 -0700
Re: The overpass Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-13 23:04 -0500
Re: The overpass "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:55 -0700
csiph-web