Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #468455
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird |
| Date | 2017-07-14 14:47 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <okb3ch$5c6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ofvfdr$f53$1@dont-email.me> <pP2dnSWIasJcXfXEnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <okako4$jea$1@dont-email.me> <LOCdnaOjbc2LdPXEnZ2dnUU7-WfNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Michael A. Terrell wrote on 7/14/2017 11:54 AM: > rickman wrote: >> Michael A. Terrell wrote on 7/14/2017 9:01 AM: >>> >>> Select 'View' at the top, then 'Zoom'. I use the 240% setting on a 24" >>> monitor. >> >> That changes the font size in exactly one pane. >> >> SeaMonkey is every bit as bad a piece of software as T-bird. It seems >> to have the same delay problems (although not quite as bad) and has >> many other problems as well. I did manage to find a support group, >> but there isn't much help there. Seems like some people have >> problems with SeaMonkey/T-bird and others don't. > > > Big deal. How much time do you spend, on the others? Too much because they are hard to read. > You can always > change the screen's resolution. I know. I set the resolution so the rest of the computer is usable and now only the apps that ignore the Windows settings are hard to read. In particular there are icons in SeaMonkey that are *very* hard to distinguish because of their size. > I prefer the older Netscape 4.78, but it > won't install on this 64 bit Win 7 Pro system. Some people complain software won't run on old machines. Some people complain software won't run on new machines. Some people complain because the software just won't run. Damn computers... -- Rick C
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 15:53 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-05-22 17:53 -0700
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-22 18:42 -0700
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-05-22 18:56 -0700
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 23:19 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2017-05-22 23:14 -0500
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 00:17 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2017-05-23 14:15 -0500
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-14 09:01 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 10:37 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-14 11:54 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 14:47 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Bert Hickman <bert-hickman@comcast.net> - 2017-07-14 15:25 -0500
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-07-14 21:34 +0100
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 16:51 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-07-14 16:25 -0400
Re: SeaMonkey vs. Thunderbird Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2017-07-14 22:58 +0000
csiph-web