Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #640175

Re: Question for Ed Prochak

From Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Question for Ed Prochak
Date 2017-07-12 10:34 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <ok5fi7$q39$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <ddf3c656-62e6-445b-bf3c-f253e0897d1b@googlegroups.com> <6fdd978a-53a4-45d9-af86-61d1d941dacf@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/12/2017 8:37 AM, Edward Prochak wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 12:30:44 AM UTC-4, Claudius Denk wrote:
>> If McGinn was wrong wouldn't you expect to be able to find at least some evidence to that effect.
>>
>> Isn't science suppose to be about evidence and not group beliefs?
>>
>> It does appear McGinn is right.  You got nothing.
> 
> I posted various instances of evidence for about a year.
> Several methods of proof, with experimental data in published
> pear reviewed reports. I provided links to the reports
> and to other educational material.
> 
> Your response to all of it was "You got nothing."
> You are like the person claiming that the earth
> rides on the back of a turtle. When asked where
> does the turtle stand, the reply is: "It's turtles
> all the way down."
> 
> Your reply seems to be "It's steam tables, all the way down."
> 
> You have only one argument: "I don't believe you."
> 
> I will continue to annoy you because you are a bully,
> and I don't like bullies.
> 
> So there is your answer. Have a nice day.
> ed  :)
> 

notice the ONLY other person that says "McGinn is right" is Claudius 
Denk, who is James McGinn (McGinn stated such here 2 years ago)

so only one person believes "McGinn is right", that is McGinn.
*NO ONE ELSE ON PLANET EARTH* agrees with McGinn.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 21:30 -0700
  Re: Question for Ed Prochak pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-11 21:55 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:02 -0700
      Re: Question for Ed Prochak pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-11 22:15 -0700
        Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:36 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 05:46 +0000
      Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:41 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:57 -0700
      Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:52 -0700
  Re: Question for Ed Prochak Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:37 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 10:34 -0500
      Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:55 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:40 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:45 -0700
  Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 12:11 -0700
  Re: Question for Ed Prochak Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 14:25 -0500
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 12:40 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 13:09 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:48 -0700
    Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:56 -0700
      Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 09:29 -0700
        Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:52 -0700
  Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:49 -0700

csiph-web