Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #640175
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Question for Ed Prochak |
| Date | 2017-07-12 10:34 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ok5fi7$q39$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ddf3c656-62e6-445b-bf3c-f253e0897d1b@googlegroups.com> <6fdd978a-53a4-45d9-af86-61d1d941dacf@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/12/2017 8:37 AM, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 12:30:44 AM UTC-4, Claudius Denk wrote: >> If McGinn was wrong wouldn't you expect to be able to find at least some evidence to that effect. >> >> Isn't science suppose to be about evidence and not group beliefs? >> >> It does appear McGinn is right. You got nothing. > > I posted various instances of evidence for about a year. > Several methods of proof, with experimental data in published > pear reviewed reports. I provided links to the reports > and to other educational material. > > Your response to all of it was "You got nothing." > You are like the person claiming that the earth > rides on the back of a turtle. When asked where > does the turtle stand, the reply is: "It's turtles > all the way down." > > Your reply seems to be "It's steam tables, all the way down." > > You have only one argument: "I don't believe you." > > I will continue to annoy you because you are a bully, > and I don't like bullies. > > So there is your answer. Have a nice day. > ed :) > notice the ONLY other person that says "McGinn is right" is Claudius Denk, who is James McGinn (McGinn stated such here 2 years ago) so only one person believes "McGinn is right", that is McGinn. *NO ONE ELSE ON PLANET EARTH* agrees with McGinn.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 21:30 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-11 21:55 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:02 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-11 22:15 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 22:36 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-12 05:46 +0000
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:41 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 11:57 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:52 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:37 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-12 10:34 -0500
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:55 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 08:40 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:45 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 12:11 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 14:25 -0500
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 12:40 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 13:09 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:48 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:56 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 09:29 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:52 -0700
Re: Question for Ed Prochak James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:49 -0700
csiph-web