Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #424280
| From | Poutnik <Poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! |
| Date | 2017-07-08 17:43 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ojqubh$5ku$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <2ad3131d-e63e-44e8-8aa4-89ee2abb6a12@googlegroups.com> <1fSdnYcOdslvysPEnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <f43eec50-0210-498f-b20f-f00a9c36cd71@googlegroups.com> <379df647-9724-43d6-a7df-755ef8484f2d@googlegroups.com> <d4465956-87be-4d0a-b173-aa2eb1782b80@googlegroups.com> |
On 07/08/2017 05:17 PM, Nicolaas Vroom wrote: > On Saturday, 8 July 2017 15:42:02 UTC+2, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>> >>> (The stars in a galaxy are not moving inertially, as such you have >>> answered my original question) >> >> You delude yourself. by "inertially" you apparently mean "in straight >> line." > > Yes. Don't we all mean that? No. we do not. By "inertially", it means without acting external net force. It is straight line in context of Newtonian mechanics. It is straight line in context of SR and negligible gravity. In GR context, it is geodesics in non local scale, OR, is is approximately a straight line in locally inertial frame. > >> but stars move approximately that way. > > Yes. But on the long run (as in a galaxy) they move in a circle. Orbits are considered as inertial motion in GR context, as gravity is not considered as a force. -- Poutnik Guard the words you use speaking about others, as they speak about you.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 14:50 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-30 00:15 +0200
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-30 11:44 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-29 17:21 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-30 11:47 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-30 16:05 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-07-01 08:32 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-01 03:15 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-01 06:23 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Buck Millard <uiidbm@apsuw.dl> - 2017-07-01 21:02 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-06 01:21 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-06 10:32 -0500
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-08 05:37 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 06:41 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-08 08:17 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Poutnik <Poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 17:43 +0200
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Ocho Hoshouwa <yeoh@eohotwa.ey> - 2017-07-08 16:39 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 17:36 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-09 06:17 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-09 06:52 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-11 10:22 -0500
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-07-14 05:24 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 15:21 +0200
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-14 16:26 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 18:57 +0200
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-14 15:42 -0500
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-06 09:54 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-30 11:18 +1000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-29 19:01 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-30 08:44 +0000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-30 14:47 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-30 01:07 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-03 10:04 +1000
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-02 23:06 -0700
Re: I could not get my post !!!!!!!! "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-04 08:58 +1000
csiph-web