Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #423202

Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity
Date 2017-06-21 17:11 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oie9bl$qsi$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <slrnokhk43.uk8.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <oib0ef$1jsb$3@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnoki379.51u.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <oib80h$su$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnokibjs.8u0.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>

Show all headers | View raw

Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote:
> The Slow Bot, ala Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Ned Latham wrote:
>>> The Slow Bot, aka Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> Ned Latham wrote:
>>>>> Tom Roberts wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There are no valid ARGUMENTS against Special Relativity, as it is
>>>>>> a PHYSICAL THEORY.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Except that it doesn't have anything to say about how a waveform can
>>>>> travel in vaccuum.
>>>> 
>>>> But quantum field theories do.
>>> 
>>> Irrelevant. SR and GR predate all of them, and they're inconsistent with
>>> them anyway.
>> 
>> It's not irrelevant.
> 
> Wrong agaon. Skow Bot. SR and GR predate all quantum field theworues. IOW,
> SR is NOT a physical theory.
> 
> ----snip----
> 

What does presaging have to do with anything, other than indicating that
one incremental step toward a better understanding was made before the next
step? 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 03:57 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 13:30 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 06:35 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 07:47 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 09:19 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-19 22:51 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 02:36 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 04:06 -0700
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:51 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:26 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:09 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 16:56 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 07:07 -0700
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:38 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 09:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 19:50 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 19:45 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 12:18 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-21 13:22 -0700
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 18:08 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 02:10 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 02:52 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 03:47 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 04:16 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-22 06:17 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 06:40 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-23 02:30 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 03:49 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 07:32 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 05:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-23 06:38 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Valok Planek <lkupuu@kwklewan.oo> - 2017-06-24 10:27 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-23 09:43 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 11:20 +0000
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:54 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:29 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:17 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:11 +0000
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 09:03 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:24 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 16:54 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:05 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-20 18:56 +0200
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:17 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-21 09:38 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 02:48 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 13:05 +0000

csiph-web