Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #423170

Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity

From Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity
Date 2017-06-21 09:38 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oideqq$1cd6$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <a865933d-d2e1-4cc8-a694-cbccc0e83f52@googlegroups.com> <R92dnewGA-EzBtXEnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <1621950.atdPhlSkOF@PointedEars.de> <2aGdnbVlMeytVNTEnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

W dniu wtorek, 20 czerwca 2017 15:23:43 UTC+2 użytkownik Tom Roberts
napisał:

>> IBTD.  Even a physical theory has to be internally consistent first.
> 
> OK. But the math underlying SR has been proven to be as consistent as is
> Euclidean geometry, and as is real analysis. Proofs of mathematical
> consistency don't get any better than that.

Conversing with that local village idiot of 'pointedhead', makes you look 
bad, mister Tom. Leads you into evil saying 'math proven to be 
consistent'. What am I crazy, Math HAS TO be always inherently 100% 
consistent.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 03:57 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 13:30 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 06:35 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 07:47 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 09:19 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-19 22:51 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 02:36 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 04:06 -0700
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:51 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:26 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:09 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 16:56 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 07:07 -0700
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:38 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 09:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 19:50 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 19:45 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 12:18 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-21 13:22 -0700
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 18:08 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 02:10 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 02:52 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 03:47 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 04:16 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-22 06:17 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 06:40 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-23 02:30 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 03:49 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 07:32 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 05:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-23 06:38 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Valok Planek <lkupuu@kwklewan.oo> - 2017-06-24 10:27 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-23 09:43 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 11:20 +0000
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:54 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:29 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:17 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:11 +0000
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 09:03 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:24 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 16:54 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:05 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-20 18:56 +0200
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:17 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-21 09:38 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 02:48 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 13:05 +0000

csiph-web