Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #423091

Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity

From	Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity
Date	2017-06-20 13:05 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<oib6ip$1thr$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<a865933d-d2e1-4cc8-a694-cbccc0e83f52@googlegroups.com> <592f2ef0-1745-4b83-a31b-336afbd92ddb@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

JanPB wrote:

> On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 12:57:10 PM UTC+2, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> In 1905 Einstein derived, from his two postulates, the conclusion
>> "the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained
>> at B": 
>> Albert Einstein, On the electrodynamics of moving bodies, 1905: "From
>> this there ensues the following peculiar consequence.
> 
> You've posted this dozens of times (probably hundreds if one starts
> counting around 1995). It was answered the corresponding number of
> times. What do you think are accomplishing by this sort of mindless
> repetition?

In physics, repetition will never make things right and true.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 03:57 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 13:30 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 06:35 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 07:47 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-19 09:19 -0700
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-19 22:51 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 02:36 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 04:06 -0700
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:51 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:26 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:09 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 16:56 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 07:07 -0700
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:38 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 09:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 19:50 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-20 19:45 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 12:18 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-21 13:22 -0700
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 18:08 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 02:10 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 02:52 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-22 03:47 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 04:16 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-22 06:17 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 06:40 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-06-23 02:30 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 03:49 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 07:32 -0500
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-23 05:53 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-23 06:38 -0700
                Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Valok Planek <lkupuu@kwklewan.oo> - 2017-06-24 10:27 +0000
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-23 09:43 -0500
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 11:20 +0000
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 06:54 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:29 -0500
            Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 09:17 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:12 -0500
              Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:11 +0000
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 09:03 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-20 10:24 -0500
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 16:54 +0000
          Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:05 -0500
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-20 18:56 +0200
      Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-20 20:17 -0500
        Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-21 09:38 +0000
  Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 02:48 -0700
    Re: Valid and Invalid Arguments in Special Relativity Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 13:05 +0000

csiph-web