Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #635188
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter |
| Date | 2017-06-03 16:11 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <ogun2u$ads$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1daee2df-dc7f-44bb-af74-8f7614648fe8@googlegroups.com> <cc5486a4-091e-45e4-b8c7-e2b8460a9669@googlegroups.com> <9de9dff6-622d-4a5b-9c73-333a5fa03260@googlegroups.com> <oguj73$8u2$1@pcls7.std.com> <70e00e76-f516-4dc7-a9e3-34e58e0ca557@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >My model for the Atom is the spiral galaxy. >It's called "The Galaxy Model for the Atom". That's not a model. A scientific model has rules or formulas that state things like "if you do this, that happens" with rather specific statements, not just handwaving. Such as "if you drop an object on Earth, the position of the object as it falls can be described by: y(t) = -(g*t^2)/2. In other words, given a time, you have an exact position prediction. That's a model for gravity on the earth's surface. All you have is handwaving with absolutely no support, and usually conflicting with already made observations. >Opposite star arms correlate with up/down >electron pairs. Vacuous, with no evidence. >The helical field surrounding the primary >star-arm- correlating as it does with the up >electron- means that the opposite star arm >will have the opposite helical field. You don't even understand "up" and "down" as referring to electrons. >One field has Matter stars. >The other field has antimatter stars. Conflicts with already existing observations. And what about non-spiral galaxies? What about spirals with odd numbers of arms? What about galaxies with partial or ill- defined arms? >These ideas come because I HAVE a model. No you don't. You have a whole bunch of vacuous claims with no evidence or predictions. >Perhaps they're right about white dwarfs; >perhaps they drift to the edges of the arms >in both cases, and interact. >Track some. >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-02 14:57 -0400
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:05 -0700
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 04:52 -0700
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 06:29 -0700
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 06:56 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-03 15:05 +0000
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 08:17 -0700
Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-03 16:11 +0000
Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 09:53 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-04 04:41 +0000
Re: Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 08:27 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-04 16:43 +0000
Re: Re: Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 10:21 -0700
Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 07:00 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-03 15:16 +0000
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 16:15 -0500
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 15:31 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 21:21 +0000
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 14:53 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 23:13 +0000
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 16:55 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 16:59 -0700
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 09:41 -0500
Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-05 00:38 +0000
Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 19:48 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-05 04:18 +0000
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 08:32 +0200
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our gala xy’s antimatter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 09:36 -0500
Re: Merging white dwarfs may create most of our galaxy’s antimatter Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 20:36 -0700
csiph-web