Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #421178

Re: Do you like gedanken?

Show all headers | View raw

<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> W dniu środa, 31 maja 2017 00:35:20 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu wtorek, 30 maja 2017 22:49:48 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>> W dniu wtorek, 30 maja 2017 21:30:41 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So, ask them whether "important, visible,
>>>>>>> easy to count" are advantageous for them or
>>>>>>> not. You don't have to, poor idiot, eh? You
>>>>>>> obviously know better, because you're following
>>>>>>> The Shit of an insane guru.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's already in what they've written. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Have they?  You're imagining, poor idiot.
>>>>> Once again. I'm an engineer. You're
>>>>> a carpenter. DON"T TELL ME HOW WE
>>>>> WORK. Poor idiot.
>>>> 
>>>> Hey, the stuff is published. 
>>> 
>>> WHAT stuff?
>>> What, precisely, did they publish?
>>> Did they write "important, visible,
>>> easy to count are not advantageous 
>>> at all"?
>>> You're both pathetic and funny.
>>> As expected from fanatic trash.
>> 
>> Well, there are lots of places you can look to see what's deemed important,
>> regardless what you personally think is important. 
> 
> Surely, instead thinking personally, I should
> obey the gurus telling me what is important.

Well, there you go. You are certainly free to think for yourself, and to
separate yourself from scientists and your fellow engineers. It will still
be the case that scientists and engineers do not advocate what you
advocate, and for good and documented reasons. As I said, they will move
society along without you, leaving you behind to stew in your common sense.
All those unspoken, undocumented criteria you say are there implicitly but
not explicitly.  

Have a nice 13th century.

> Like you do... They're so incredibly wise!
> They've analyzed MMX experiment,  they surely
> know what is important.
> It's not how engineering work, however. 
> 
>> You can cling to your MINOR advantages and your common sense if that
>> comforts you. Meanwhile the rest of the world will move on. 
> 
> And, unfortunately, it won't use your idiocy. For its MAJOR 
> disadvantages. Check at GPS.
> 
>> See any of your criteria in there? No? Hmmm. What does that tell you about
>> your common sense?
> 
> That it's a basic knowledge for dummies. Like you.
> Take a look at advanced clocks - GPS clocks, 
> TAI clocks, UTC clocks.
> None of them obey your idiocy.
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 04:38 -0700
  Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 14:54 +0000
    Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 09:08 -0700
      Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 00:31 +0000
        Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 23:31 -0700
          Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 11:11 +0000
            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 05:39 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 15:42 +0200
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 06:58 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-30 14:22 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:01 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 18:45 +0200
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:19 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 14:55 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:14 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 18:30 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:55 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 19:30 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 13:29 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 20:49 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 14:08 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 22:35 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 23:50 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 12:59 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-31 06:36 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 14:27 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 03:29 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 23:52 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 12:59 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 14:17 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-31 08:22 -0700
    Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-29 18:18 +0000
      Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 12:42 -0700

csiph-web