Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #421081

Re: Do you like gedanken?

Show all headers | View raw

<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> W dniu wtorek, 30 maja 2017 16:55:46 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu wtorek, 30 maja 2017 13:11:49 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>> W dniu wtorek, 30 maja 2017 02:31:39 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>> W dniu poniedziałek, 29 maja 2017 16:54:20 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
>>>>>>>>> and return to old, day-related second.
>>>>>>>>> What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
>>>>>>>>> "pyf!" and vanish.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What on earth would be the advantage of returning to a day-based second?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You can ask GPS designers, UTC designers or 
>>>>>>> TAI designers.
>>>>>>> But you won't understand the answer anyway.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm asking you. Can you come up with a coherent reason?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Listen, halfbrain. The question is about the way a 
>>>>> human brain makes its decisions. Do you realize it? Or
>>>>> are you too stupid even for that?
>>>>> It's a complicated subject, and you have NO BASICS. 
>>>>> Neither your toys, nor your moronic physics knows 
>>>>> ANYTHING about it. All  you have is your moronic 
>>>>> arrogance believing that nothing can surprise a 
>>>>> true follower of The Shit. 
>>>>> Explaining you anything is a waste of time. I've 
>>>>> tried some times, and I know your reaction. "hahaha,
>>>>> can't be, my gurus have never spoken of that". 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see any coherent reason in that. I don't even see an attempt. 
>>> 
>>> Yes, I know. 
>>> OK. I will try:
>>> because, in opposition to a Cs click, a day is
>>> -important
>>> -visible
>>> -easy to count
>>> Satisfied, poor idiot?
>>> 
>> 
>> Your metrics of quality would also favor the cubit as the standard of
>> length.
> 
> No, poor idiot, it wouldn't.
> 
>> Based on the forearm, it meets all the criteria you have laid out
>> as advantageous. 
> 
> Yes, it does. 

Which shows the poor value of your criteria. 

> 
>> Unfortunately it meets none of the criteria that engineers
>> and scientists hold as more important than your personal thoughts:
> 
> Instead telling an engineer tales of the criteria he 
> holds, you really should stick to your toys and
> tables, poor arrogant idiot. 

What engineers advocate is written down by them. Previously you stated that
your fellow engineers have been deceived or deluded. 

> But, true, the calculus of advantages and disadvantages is 
> against cubit. 

Exactly. The cubit lacks stability, reproducibility, and precision. So does
a day-based second, which is the reason it hasn't been used in a very long
time. Neither has the cubit. 

> It's also against your idiocy, unfortunately. You can
> check it at GPS.
> 
> 
>> I think you'd be much happier in a different age. Some century far removed
>> from this one, in fact. 
> 
> Don't try to think. Thinking requires common sense
> and you don't have it.

Well, there you go touting the virtues of a failure-prone tool again. Not a
sound strategy. 

 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 04:38 -0700
  Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 14:54 +0000
    Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 09:08 -0700
      Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 00:31 +0000
        Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 23:31 -0700
          Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 11:11 +0000
            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 05:39 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 15:42 +0200
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 06:58 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-30 14:22 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:01 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 18:45 +0200
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:19 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 14:55 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:14 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 18:30 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 11:55 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 19:30 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 13:29 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 20:49 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 14:08 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 22:35 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 23:50 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 12:59 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-31 06:36 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 14:27 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 03:29 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-30 23:52 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 12:59 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 14:17 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-31 08:22 -0700
    Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-29 18:18 +0000
      Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-29 12:42 -0700

csiph-web