Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #421041
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Reality versus Math |
| Date | 2017-05-30 08:37 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ogjsj8$e5r$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <60b9040e-9f65-4ba1-8179-de5aa7ff722c@googlegroups.com> <ogf295$vki$2@gioia.aioe.org> <f1435a94-9e09-49ae-93eb-cbd4d27f64ed@googlegroups.com> <oght36$1fse$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f2f150c3-aaac-48c3-acc3-e6b7022251f5@googlegroups.com> |
On 5/30/17 8:35 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 3:34:02 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 5/29/17 10:40 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 1:44:08 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 11:19:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 5/26/17 10:14 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 5:29:44 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/24/17 4:02 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 10:36:45 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/24/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 3:30:46 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/17 1:34 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/17 8:57 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:49:07 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/17 5:01 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 12:51:12 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken, you have nothing to offer with a "better explanation" because you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't know what the original explanation is. You inventing a different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> account that YOU understand is not better. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My explanation is certainly better. The problem is your fanatical attitude. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken, it is only better if someone ELSE says it's better. Nobody has. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody has purchased your book. No physicist has ever said that you have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a solid idea here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New idea will encounter resistance from the establishment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The copyright reviewer is a physicist and she think that I have a solid idea. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Ken, the copyright reviewer is NOT a physicist. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes she is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it. What's her name? >>>>>>>>>>>> Copyright reviewers are rarely if ever professionals in the field. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are wrong.....reviewers for physics book need to understand physics. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No sir. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then you have no clue who copyright works. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, Ken, but you're living in a dreamworld. The qualifications and >>>>>>>> skillsets of copyright reviewers for the Library of Congress are on >>>>>>>> their jobs website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Idiot....how would she know that my work on physics and cosmology is >>>>>>> original if she doesn’t know current physics. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ken, the world does not work the way you think makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> For sure the world does not work the way you think. The copyright >>>>> reviewer must have a background on the work he /she is reviewing. >>>> >>>> Prove it. Let's ask her. Afraid of the answer? >>> >>> I don’t have to prove anything to you......everytime I asked you a question on >>> SR you told me to go and read a book. So I suggest that you go and finding out by writing to the copy right Office. >> >> I've already done that. The job requirements for copyright reviewer are >> posted online. I suggested you look at it. You decided not to, instead >> choosing to MAKE UP what you think the requirements of the job are. > > I didn’t make up anything.....I said that she had to know physics to conclude > that my book on physics and cosmology is original. And that's wrong. It's simple to prove it. Let's ask her. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I know why you don't want to cite her name. You don't want anyone >>>>>> looking up her credentials to prove you wrong. >>>>> >>>>> No....I don’t want you to write her a threatening letter. >>>> >>>> What would anybody threaten her with. >>> >>> I don’t know.....you got the answer to your question. >> >> So it's baseless babble. There's nothing to threaten her with, therefore >> no reason to avoid writing her to ask. You're just throwing smoke, >> trying to avoid facing the truth. >> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise how do they know if the work they are reviewing is copyrightable? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because they're not evaluating the physics. They're evaluating whether >>>>>>>>>> it is original and exhibits creativity. A reviewer does not need to be a >>>>>>>>>> subject-matter expert to do that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Idiot....They have to evaluate whether the material is new physics and to do that >>>>>>>>> they must evaluate if the material is new physics. Gee you are so fucking stupid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I notice that you are unable to provide her name..... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Odd (Aka PD) I don’t want to give her name to you so that you can >>>>>>>>> write a threatening letter >>>>>>>>> to her......just as you did to me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Delusional Ken, I have never, not once, written any letter to you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liar. >>>>>> >>>>>> No Ken, it's true. I’ve never, not once, written any letter to you. >>>>> >>>>> You did. >>>> >>>> Libel Ken. Prove it. Scan the letter and post a link. >>>> You're the liar >>> >>> Your name is PD and you wrote a threatening letter to my Daughter. >> >> First of all, my name is not PD, and if PD wrote a letter to your >> daughter, that is not the same as ME writing a letter to YOU, is it? >> You’re a fucking liar, Ken, caught in another lie. > > Yes your name is Paul Draper (PD). >> >> Be careful of what crimes you accuse people of, if you don't have >> evidence to back it up. You can > get taken to court for that. > > I welcome the court case. You'd lose. You may have nothing left to lose. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-20 08:22 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:32 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:34 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-22 04:45 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 08:27 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-22 08:44 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math Seki Ushisa <sis@iscauhw.ea> - 2017-05-22 13:57 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-22 09:50 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math Seki Ushisa <sis@iscauhw.ea> - 2017-05-22 18:20 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Seki Ushisa <sis@iscauhw.ea> - 2017-05-22 18:24 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-22 09:13 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 11:51 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-22 14:49 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-22 22:50 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 07:47 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-23 06:41 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 13:02 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 14:28 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-24 05:01 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 09:28 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-24 17:03 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-23 23:17 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-24 14:36 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-24 08:45 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-24 16:34 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-24 23:24 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-24 08:43 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math sdru.product@gmail.com - 2017-05-23 10:02 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-22 15:01 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 07:49 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-23 05:58 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-23 06:57 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 13:04 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-23 11:34 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 14:30 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-24 05:16 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 09:36 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 16:29 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-26 08:14 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:19 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-26 23:55 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-27 05:37 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-28 05:58 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-28 17:44 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-29 08:40 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-29 16:42 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 14:33 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-30 06:35 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 08:37 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-30 14:36 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 10:47 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-28 06:18 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-05-28 07:18 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Sienkiewicz Emniak <iecunkn@swazine.po> - 2017-05-28 15:19 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-28 16:31 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-28 17:45 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-29 08:33 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-29 08:59 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-29 10:54 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Earnest Rives <ueeenn@wweiwne.ac> - 2017-05-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-30 07:17 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Ernest Rivers <erwm@weicnne.ac> - 2017-05-30 19:02 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 06:24 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-28 17:44 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 14:39 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-30 07:18 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 09:36 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-30 12:28 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 19:41 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Ernest Schwanenflügel <erwm@wanenf.oa> - 2017-05-30 19:54 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 22:35 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-30 20:04 -0400
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 00:38 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-31 06:42 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 09:01 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-31 09:18 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-31 07:53 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 10:39 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-31 08:54 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 17:08 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 15:28 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 16:55 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math sdru.product@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 12:11 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-31 14:52 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2017-05-30 15:41 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-28 19:42 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-28 14:36 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-28 23:04 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-25 02:38 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-24 16:46 +0000
Re: Reality versus Math Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-22 13:00 -0500
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-22 21:41 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 07:30 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-23 11:27 -0700
Re: Reality versus Math moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-22 15:40 +0000
csiph-web