Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #420499
| From | Priscilia Wagenknecht <pw@ewwulciwnu.ue> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein |
| Followup-To | alt.local.village.idiot |
| Date | 2017-05-24 14:29 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <og45bb$14gv$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <26a96e01-0a23-4e69-8fe2-3bd49a536237@googlegroups.com> <13847ad8-a5c0-42e0-8cd6-6c3fed4e7fe7@googlegroups.com> <og25ru$1tkh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1658281.CQOukoFCf9@PointedEars.de> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.local.village.idiot
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Seki Ushisa wrote: > >> JanPB wrote: >>> On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 2:09:03 PM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote: >>>> Premise: "If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also >>>> accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same >>>> acceleration as material bodies." >>>> http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristian/Courses/PHYS4480/4480-PROBLEMS/ >> optics-gravit-lens_PPT.pdf >>> >>> This is like 100th time you bring this pointlessness up. >> >> Well, light comes from material bodies, > > That does not mean anything. In particular, it does not mean that light > would have material properties. > >> it makes pretty much sense. > > Only to you, ’nym-shifting Tensor troll. To you, even the greatest > nonsense makes sense. Or so you say. This is 2nd time you are plonking Dr. Seki, by quoting each and every interesting lines, you lying bitch. Moreover, you seems to be the local village idiot around here, not knowing that Matter and material objects are the one and the only origin of EM radiation, light. What am I crazy, you are so stupid loosing two wars in less than a half century. Then a four wheels car to put together, without cheating, is not one of your capabilities.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-22 14:09 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 15:31 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Seki Ushisa <sis@iscauhw.ea> - 2017-05-23 20:25 +0000
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-24 00:51 +0200
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Priscilia Wagenknecht <pw@ewwulciwnu.ue> - 2017-05-24 14:29 +0000
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-24 16:38 +0200
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-23 03:18 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-25 13:05 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-25 13:12 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-25 15:37 -0700
Re: How the Pound-Rebka Experiment Refutes Einstein xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-05-25 20:34 -0700
csiph-web