Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #461419
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: OT new Li battery? |
| Date | 2017-05-23 15:53 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <og23po$ru2$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <00b9155d-ec32-41e1-8d56-5bdf43bdb35c@googlegroups.com> <3cfc0a28-ea34-6d72-4c94-2be2c413a643@electrooptical.net> <og23ja$ru2$1@dont-email.me> |
rickman wrote: > Phil Hobbs wrote: >> On 05/23/2017 12:25 PM, George Herold wrote: >>> I heard about this on the radio driving home last night. >>> https://news.utexas.edu/2017/02/28/goodenough-introduces-new-battery-technology >>> >>> Here's the paper. >>> https://docs.wind-watch.org/braga2017.pdf >>> >>> Lunch time reading. >>> >>> George H. >>> >> >> Cool. Hope they start making them soon. > > I expect I heard the same radio report. The inventor is John Goodenough > who was a pioneer in the original Li ion battery, used LiCoO2 as the > positive terminal which allowed the technology to be economically > practical. Since the material donates Li ions, it allows the negative > terminal to be something *other* than metallic Lithium which makes the > batteries much safer (in spite of the reports of the dangers of Li Ion > batteries). > > I think he has some street creds, but then so did Linus Pauling. The > radio report said some scientists feel Goodenough's claims violate the > 1st law of thermodynamics. I haven't read the paper myself. I forgot to mention, like many new technologies, the main problem is the cost. So Goodenough may be just the guy to find a way past that. -- Rick C
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT new Li battery? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-23 09:25 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? sdy <sdeyoreo@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-23 09:33 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-23 10:35 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-23 18:08 +0000
Re: OT new Li battery? edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2017-05-23 11:23 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-23 19:46 +0000
Re: OT new Li battery? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-23 12:06 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-23 19:43 +0000
Re: OT new Li battery? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-05-23 09:42 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-05-23 12:48 -0400
Re: OT new Li battery? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 15:50 -0400
Re: OT new Li battery? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-23 15:53 -0400
Re: OT new Li battery? Bill Martin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2017-05-23 15:53 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-23 20:33 -0400
Re: OT new Li battery? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-05-24 09:07 +1000
Re: OT new Li battery? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-05-24 13:39 +1000
Re: OT new Li battery? George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-24 06:22 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 12:25 -0400
Re: OT new Li battery? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-05-25 23:40 -0800
Re: OT new Li battery? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-05-26 16:58 +1000
Re: OT new Li battery? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-05-26 08:40 -0700
Re: OT new Li battery? Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2017-05-27 01:33 +0200
csiph-web