Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #419679
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe |
| Date | 2017-05-16 16:14 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <offq36$1qdk$4@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <d5e3fd5b-615c-4ab3-a47f-68d6341978b3@googlegroups.com> <ofcq3d$va5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f07eea75-4047-4cab-b091-9ee065807b3c@googlegroups.com> <off6n6$o2j$4@gioia.aioe.org> <dc869853-1d0c-4e8f-be8d-2a9b5e8b0279@googlegroups.com> |
On 5/16/17 2:32 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:43:37 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 5/16/17 6:21 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 1:56:02 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 5/15/17 12:15 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 12:53:00 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 5/15/17 11:39 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 9:24:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/15/17 8:07 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, May 14, 2017 at 6:02:10 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/17 8:50 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 2:56:49 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/13/17 8:52 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> So according to you what is the scientific method? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> See??? You have to ASK what the scientific method is, because you have >>>>>>>>>> no idea what it is. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here you are on a science newsgroup, PRETENDING to be doing science, and >>>>>>>>>> you have no idea even what the scientific method IS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How does the PT violate the scientific method? Why finding the physical model of the universe before >>>>>>>>> the development of the math model violate the scientific method?????? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How does PT or Model Mechanics violated the Scientific Method????? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ken, it is NOT the scientific method, it is your own method. Since you >>>>>>>> are not using the scientific method, then you are not doing science. >>>>>>>> Pure and simple. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are two definitions of Scientific Method: >>>>>>> a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in >>>>>>> systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a method of investigation in which a problem is first identified and observations, experiments, or other relevant >>>>>>> data are then used to construct or test hypotheses that purport to solve it >>>>>> >>>>>> Neither of these have any depth as descriptions of the scientific >>>>>> method. Try to find something a little richer than a dictionary definition. >>>>> >>>>> So you have your own definition for scientific Method and you don’t want to share it with anybody. >>>> >>>> No, Ken, it is not my own definition. It is a well-known description of >>>> the scientific method that is available in a wide spectrum of books and >>>> online web pages, and which many people understand. >>> >>>> You do not understand what it is, and you don't want to even try >>>> googling it to find out what it is. You want someone to share it with >>>> you here. >>> >>> Idiot I did googled and found the two definitions. You are a waste of time. >> >> Find something with Google that's a little richer than a two line >> definition. > > Why don’t you do it? Why don’t you provide your version of scientific method? Because I prefer it when you demonstrate your own complete incompetence at doing any research to learn anything other than what people tell you here. >> >>>> >>>> You are completely incapable of researching anything outside of your own >>>> head. And you think you are competent to do science, when you can't even >>>> remember from high school what the scientific method is? And you can't >>>> do 5th grade algebra? >>>> >>>>> Then you claimed that my method of PT for doing science is not scientific according to your own >>>>> private definition. I suggest that you go see a Shrink. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which of these two definitions says that the current method for positing the dark matter and dark energy is >>>>>>> scientific? And what in these definitions says that the PT and Model Mechanics explanation for dark matter >>>>>>> and dark energy are not scientific?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ken, have you tried Googling "scientific method" to find something a >>>>>> little more in depth about the scientific method? >>>> >>>> Tell you what, Ken. When you move into a nursing home, try ringing the >>>> little bell in your room, and when the attendant comes, ask her what the >>>> scientific method is. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-12 13:11 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 15:18 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 06:37 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 13:54 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-14 06:43 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-14 16:59 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 05:56 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 08:03 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 10:06 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 15:20 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-13 02:37 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 16:05 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 06:52 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 16:14 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-13 09:21 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-14 12:47 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-14 15:11 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 13:56 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-14 06:50 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-14 13:58 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-14 15:19 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-14 17:02 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 06:07 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 08:24 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 09:39 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 11:52 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 10:15 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 12:55 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 04:21 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:43 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:32 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:14 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:50 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:15 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-15 23:26 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-12 20:16 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 07:07 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 01:41 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 20:01 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 21:17 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 09:57 +0200
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 07:14 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 16:37 +0200
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-13 14:54 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 08:01 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-13 15:08 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 14:39 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 04:51 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe 01405 <0140519@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 06:22 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:44 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:07 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-17 18:41 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-16 15:27 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:42 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:13 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:57 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:18 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-17 18:30 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:48 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:36 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:15 -0500
csiph-web