Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #26511
| From | Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? |
| Date | 2017-05-14 15:36 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ofaei4$fc1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <dOidnTprV45sEIXEnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Tim Wescott wrote: > Got curious after a question on EmbeddedRelated.com -- is there a > unified SBC market, or is it totally splattered? 20 years ago if > someone said "industrial SBC" then there was probably a PC-104 board > in the mix, and if they said "military SBC" then it was probably > VME. > > I'm wondering if that's still the case, or if the world has been > taken over by BeagleBxxx and XXXX-Pi boards. > > Hard evidence (i.e., what you've actually worked on or next to, or > market surveys by independent third parties) is to be preferred. > Googling for market surveys doesn't lead to much satisfaction, but > that could just be my lack of Google-Fu. > I have a thing in the pipeline where a Coldfire board that went obsolete years ago is being ported to an ARM based on a RasPi 3. I've built a HAL for it and am running, more or less, the original code[1] on the HAL. The HAL mocks memory-mapped peripherals on the obsolete hardware. [1] which used an ancient extension of 'C'. The first prototype will be an actual RasPi 3 with USB peripherals. But even more than that, I am developing a rather slavish devotion to building plant simulators using small $50 ARM boards and USB peripherals. Some of the USB peripherals are Ardiunos. It is simply the right thing to do these days. The simulator will diverge from the actual plant, but if you do this right, you can fold the error signals into the plant model iteratively until they match well enough. There is one cultural problem - many people irrationally believe their system needs much lower latency than it actually does. -- Les Cargill
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What are people using for single-board computers these days? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2017-05-14 12:03 -0500
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-05-14 15:36 -0500
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-05-16 12:13 -0700
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 21:43 -0400
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-20 00:55 -0700
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2017-05-21 15:55 -0400
Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2017-06-01 21:24 -0700
csiph-web