Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #26511

Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days?

From Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days?
Date 2017-05-14 15:36 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ofaei4$fc1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <dOidnTprV45sEIXEnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Tim Wescott wrote:
> Got curious after a question on EmbeddedRelated.com -- is there a
> unified SBC market, or is it totally splattered?  20 years ago if
> someone said "industrial SBC" then there was probably a PC-104 board
> in the mix, and if they said "military SBC" then it was probably
> VME.
>
> I'm wondering if that's still the case, or if the world has been
> taken over by BeagleBxxx and XXXX-Pi boards.
>
> Hard evidence (i.e., what you've actually worked on or next to, or
> market surveys by independent third parties) is to be preferred.
> Googling for market surveys doesn't lead to much satisfaction, but
> that could just be my lack of Google-Fu.
>

I have a thing in the pipeline where a Coldfire board that went
obsolete years ago is being ported to an ARM based on a RasPi 3. I've
built a HAL for it and am running, more or less, the original code[1]
on the HAL. The HAL mocks memory-mapped peripherals on the obsolete
hardware.

[1] which used an ancient extension of 'C'.

The first prototype will be an actual RasPi 3 with USB peripherals.

But even more than that, I am developing a rather slavish devotion to
building plant simulators using small $50 ARM boards and USB
peripherals.

Some of the USB peripherals are Ardiunos.

It is simply the right thing to do these days. The simulator will
diverge from the actual plant, but if you do this right, you can fold
the error signals into the  plant model iteratively until they match
well enough.

There is one cultural problem - many people irrationally believe their 
system needs much lower latency than it actually does.

-- 
Les Cargill

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What are people using for single-board computers these days? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2017-05-14 12:03 -0500
  Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-05-14 15:36 -0500
  Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-05-16 12:13 -0700
  Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 21:43 -0400
  Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-20 00:55 -0700
  Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2017-05-21 15:55 -0400
    Re: What are people using for single-board computers these days? jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2017-06-01 21:24 -0700

csiph-web