Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #630212
| From | "a425couple" <a425couple@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: The March for ... What? |
| Date | 2017-04-23 05:51 -0700 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <odi82205g9@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <58FB9F9B.69CA@ix.netcom.com> <58FBA226.1A26@ix.netcom.com> <_qVKA.31625$uf1.14213@fx40.iad> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
"Mike Van Pelt" <mvp@web1.calweb.com> wrote in message... > In article <58FBA226.1A26@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>The March for ... What? > > I wondered about that myself. What I (who am incapable of > speaking the words "President Trump" without my eyes doing a > high-velociity barrel roll) saw of the lead-up to it is that it > is pure strident political partisanship. They railed against > those who don't accept the scientific consensus on CO2/climate > change. But were there any of them with anything negative to > say about those who reject the scientific consensus on things > the "hippie contingent" differs with Science on? Like GMO food? > Nuclear power? > > Since one of the sponsors of the March for "Science" is the > Union of Concerned "Scientists", I suspect not. We have the > CO2 output we do in large part due to the UCS's leading role > in omni-obstructionism of all things nuclear power. We would > likely have phased out coal in favor of nuclear decades ago > if not for them. > > Those who claim that industrial civilization can survive solely > on "sunny days when the wind is blowing" energy are engaging in > Arithmetic Denial. Maybe we need to have a March for > Arithmetic. > > Before going off on the "waste" issue, search for "Sedan Crater" > in Google Earth. Scan south from there. That's in the general > area of Yucca Mountain. Explain to me how the remnants of > hundreds of nuclear bomb craters, completely uncontained, is a > greater hazard than properly contained and isolated waste. > It's the very sorts of people Marching for "Science" whose > omni-obstructionism has prevented the Yucca Mountain repository > from being used for the purpose for which it was built at great > expense. Then they argue "What about the waste?" like Erik > and Lyle Menendez demanding the court's mercy because they > are orphans. > -- > "The urge to save humanity is almost | Mike Van Pelt > always a false front for the urge to rule." | mvp at calweb.com > -- H.L. Mencken | KE6BVH Good one!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scientists, students and research advocates The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 11:23 -0700
The March for ... What? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 11:34 -0700
scientists look like--often male and white The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 11:53 -0700
"weird" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 11:55 -0700
Re: "Science is not red or blue...." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 12:02 -0700
Re: "weird" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 12:15 -0700
Re: scientists look like--often male and white The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 12:07 -0700
Re: The March for ... What? "Kevin Jones" <mapihapimapihapal@gmal.com> - 2017-04-22 15:04 -0700
Re: The March for ... What? mvp@web1.calweb.com (Mike Van Pelt) - 2017-04-23 03:44 +0000
Re: The March for ... What? "a425couple" <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-23 05:51 -0700
Re: The March for ... What? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-04-23 08:37 -0700
Re: The March for ... What? leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2017-04-23 12:24 -0500
csiph-web