Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #629636

Re: AP injects nutty thoughts on Dark Matter when things move abnormally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations

Show all headers | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 10:35:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> >Alright, I found the answer, in Scientific American, Dec. 2016 written by P=
>> >anek.
>> 
>> >He describes gas clouds on the edge of the Andromeda galaxy spinning as fas=
>> >t as stars near the Nucleus. In other words, solid body rotation to the edg=
>> >e of the galaxy.
>> 
>> >So, the fake hypothesis of Dark Matter originates with Solid Body Rotation.
>> 
>> No, silly, Rubin discovered the outer edge moved at the same speed as
>> parts near the center. Not solid body rotation since the outer edge stars
>> have a longer trip around the center.

>Then you are saying all is normal, and the conjecture of Dark Matter was 
>inserted because the edge speed was normal and the center speed was 
>normal.

Quit making up crap. I said nothing of the sort. Rubin noticed things were
NOT moving normally, stuff at the outer edge was moving at the same speed 
as the inner edge, not slower (like how Pluto moves slower than Mercury).

>So, you think that when everything is moving normally, then physicists 
>have to inject Dark Matter. Did HVAC whisper this into your ear?

Does not follow.

>By the way, do you actually know how star speeds are calculated, and why 
>Ford's instrument was an improvement, or is that too far over your head 
>and that Wikipedia does not have a entry on it.

They had access to a highly accurate spectral analyzer and time on high
power telescopes.  They determined speed by the Doppler shift of light.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Who taught MM-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it  Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 13:17 -0700
  Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 01:36 +0000
    can the MM failure of physics cite a source for his outer-reach-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:29 -0700
      Re: can the AP failure of physics cite a source for his core-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 05:01 +0000
        MM has no source for his claim that outer-reach stars gave birth to dark matter Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 22:14 -0700
          Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 00:32 -0700
            Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 05:57 -0700
              Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 06:19 -0700
              yes, what did Rubin & Ford mean by edge? was it the R or the 1/R boundary Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 13:32 -0700
                When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 00:38 -0700
                Panek gives a good overview of Rubin history Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 11:31 -0700
                Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 03:35 +0000
                MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 21:05 -0700
                Re: MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-17 22:21 -0700
                Re: AP injects nutty thoughts on Dark Matter when things move abnormally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 06:02 +0000
                Proof that Michael Moroney is a complete physics failure// little better than Porat, Odd, HVAC, Benj, but worse than Ed Prochak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 23:12 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:02 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:38 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 10:45 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 13:06 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 14:46 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 17:19 -0700
                Re: Proof that Archimeded Plutonium is a complete physics failure// moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 13:29 +0000
              Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:02 -0400
            Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 17:06 +0000
          Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 13:18 +0000
            Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:30 -0700
              Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 16:59 +0000
    Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:37 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:46 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 18:02 +0000

csiph-web