Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #627411

Re: Precession

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Precession
Date 2017-04-06 09:19 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oc5iph$nrl$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <19ed5ec5-101b-4174-8ce2-d4c25a207151@googlegroups.com> <oc32ht$m9t$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1dc9332e-358b-4b1a-94a3-7bc9e61fb612@googlegroups.com> <oc395u$13n4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <3390f85e-b6b9-4b0d-b38e-dcf6260e0ba0@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/5/2017 6:36 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "
> If the torque is removed, yes. If the torque remains, then the direction
> of the axis will continue to change.
>
> "
>
> So, can we agree that spinning things
> have zero precession by default?

I don't know what "default" means to you. The presence of precession has 
to do with the presence and direction of an external torque.

> And they resist any change in their state
> more strongly, the faster they spin?

The phrase "their state" is too loose. If you mean that the change in 
angular momentum is reduced, the faster they spin, the answer is no. If 
you mean that the rate of precession is decreased, the answer is yes.


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 07:01 -0700
  Re: Precession Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-04-04 10:07 -0500
    Re: Precession noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 08:45 -0700
  Re: Precession moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-04 15:27 +0000
  Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 10:49 -0500
    Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 10:41 -0700
      Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 12:45 -0500
        Re: Precession Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-04-04 14:32 -0500
        Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 07:59 -0700
          Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:30 -0500
            Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:10 -0700
              Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:23 -0500
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 16:36 -0700
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 07:02 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:19 -0500
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:18 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 11:36 -0500
                Re: Precession "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 10:26 -0700
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 11:17 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 13:45 -0500
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 12:07 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 14:31 -0500
                Re: Precession pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-06 15:06 -0700
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 12:32 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 14:46 -0500
                Re: Precession benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 20:23 -0400
                Re: Precession moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-07 03:51 +0000
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 06:40 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:53 -0500
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 07:38 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:58 -0500
                Re: Precession john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 07:58 -0700
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 10:00 -0500
                Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 10:02 -0500
                Re: Precession moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-07 15:32 +0000
                Re: Precession moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-07 18:04 +0000
                Re: Precession benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 20:22 -0400
                Re: Precession moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-07 03:50 +0000
                Re: Precession noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:41 -0700
                Re: Precession noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 20:21 -0700
  Re: Precession Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 11:38 -0700
  Re: Precession "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 10:25 -0700
  Re: Precession Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:32 -0500

csiph-web