Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #625229
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Beware of the hype |
| Date | 2017-03-26 19:00 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ob9kml$il2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <99864c9b-7373-42dd-9251-849982528e87@googlegroups.com> |
On 3/26/2017 2:01 PM, richard@microscitech.com wrote: > Beware of the hype... > > I frequently read phys.org, but is it me, or is the hype on robotics > and, especially, driverless cars, going stratospheric? > hype for gov funding > As regards robotics: I do not have or see anything nearing that will > vacuum my house in any way. Neither do I believe we have any chance > of such a device within at least 20 years. We were promised 'Robbie > the household robot' at least fifty years ago. dop the ironing as > well. Nowt, absolutely nowt nearing this so far. Washing the dishes? > Well, the best we have is a dishwasher running a 19th century > cotton-mill program - a knitting machine really. agree, robot cost per chore is far too high. > > I'm not surprised, it is very difficult (vacuuming the house), and we > will probably only do it within say 30 years (minimum). But, in the > next few years, fat chance! A bit like Fusion but harder, and that > aint easy as we can all see. > > So on to driverless cars. This topic has also gone beserk recently. > > I note that every trial seems to have a human driver in a driverless > car! They say there is minimal driver intervention. More like maximal > press intervention, sucking up to their advertising masters. they dont want the car to drive over someone, or their little doggie. (quite true) > > In truth, these driverless cars (paradoxically with a human driver) > drive mostly in a straight line and stop if an object is close. > Great. Its called radar, we had it 70+ years ago, or proximity > sensors as they are called today. There is no intelligence here > whatsoever is there? I'm open to question, but I don't see it? It's a > sensor, it measures distance, without any thought or intelligence. they use a high power infrared lasar radar, about $50,000 each (google) that maps the area. it is not eye safe within about 4 feet. also they integrate the data from various sensors, not that high tech. > > I too know one day we will crack it, but it won't happen in the next > 10 years, and I wish the media would stop listening to all the crap > hype emanating from Tesla and chums. Tesla makes its money from Gov Funding. It has to put out the hype to keep the money flowing. > These guys saw a movie (Iron > Man), and now some loud mouth with a bizarre name claims all, but it > is just hype, pure hype, and self promotion of course. agree. > > Why the rant? Well, this year the press, media, governments, seem to > think it is all going to happen with a few years. This year it seems > to have all gone ballistic. Yet the technology has most definitely > not. what is being ignored is the failure rate, each device you add onto a system lowers the reliability, and it will fail earlier. so with a complex car, 30 more sensors, and a million lines of code, > > I can assure you, it ain't going happen any day real soon now. > > 50's AI anyone? I'm still waiting... > > The message: Beware of the hype. > > Richard Miller http://www.urmt.org >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-03-26 12:01 -0700
Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-26 21:43 +0000
Re: Beware of the hype benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:46 -0400
Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Beware of the hype benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 16:52 -0400
Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Beware of the hype Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 19:00 -0500
Re: Beware of the hype Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 03:17 -0400
Re: Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-03-31 14:10 -0700
Re: Beware of the hype noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-04-07 12:58 -0700
csiph-web