Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #28550
| Subject | Re: Serial Port Emulation |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| References | (4 earlier) <q4dv2f$9qb$1@dont-email.me> <hvxaE.26246$JT2.6259@fx10.iad> <q4ec37$k6m$1@dont-email.me> <slrn3uboq6oaj4.r5h.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> <q4sbal$sre$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> |
| Message-ID | <oHlcE.176786$HC.173@fx47.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Date | 2019-02-23 19:37 -0500 |
On 2/23/19 3:48 PM, Les Cargill wrote: > Andrew Smallshaw wrote: >> On 2019-02-18, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: >>> >>> RS-232 is short distance too (though a bit longer than TTL) - for long >>> distances you use RS-485 or RS-422. RS-232 is a legacy standard - there >>> is plenty of old stuff the still has it, but it would be a strange >>> choice for anything new. >> >> I'm genuinely interested to hear people thoughts on this. Personally >> if I anticipate a true long life interfacing requirement - 20, 30, >> 40 years - RS232 is my preferred option, ideally (if appropriate >> to the use case) with a command line on it. > <snip> >> >> I don't pretend to have answers in the general case, just interested >> in what peoples thoughts are. >> > > Anything you can do with RS323 you can do with Ethernet. There are > pathological size/weight/power cases where Ethernet doesn't fit but > if it does... > Not sure I would consider it pathological to not have Ethernet as a likely option. Almost every small processor today has serial ports built in, and most of the ones that don't can fake it with bit banging pretty easy. You need a processor with much more significant resources before you get an Ethernet port on the processor, and then you need the resources for the Ethernet stack.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 02:08 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-17 13:42 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2019-02-17 15:49 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2019-02-17 18:54 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-17 21:16 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:38 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-02-18 07:25 -0500
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-18 14:31 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.org> - 2019-02-19 16:10 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 09:12 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation upsidedown@downunder.com - 2019-02-19 19:58 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-19 18:22 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-19 22:50 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:23 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-20 08:53 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation upsidedown@downunder.com - 2019-02-20 10:17 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-02-19 22:35 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation upsidedown@downunder.com - 2019-02-20 01:36 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 19:40 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-20 09:00 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation upsidedown@downunder.com - 2019-02-19 19:16 +0200
Re: Serial Port Emulation Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-02-19 22:28 +0000
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-20 10:32 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 18:44 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2019-02-23 14:48 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-23 16:34 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2019-02-27 22:15 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-02-28 08:41 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-28 15:07 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-01 10:04 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-03-01 13:09 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2019-03-04 17:58 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 02:25 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-03-01 13:16 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 16:45 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2019-03-04 17:44 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-02-23 19:37 -0500
Re: Serial Port Emulation Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2019-02-27 22:17 -0600
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 06:28 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2019-02-18 22:33 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation "A.P.Richelieu" <aprichelieu@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:06 +0100
Re: Serial Port Emulation raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 21:56 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 22:37 -0800
Re: Serial Port Emulation "Mat Nieuwenhoven" <mnieuw@zap.a2000.nl> - 2019-02-18 12:34 +0100
csiph-web