Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #625429

Re: Beware of the hype

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Beware of the hype
Date 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <o9foqd-k0f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <99864c9b-7373-42dd-9251-849982528e87@googlegroups.com> <c8plqd-ll5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <58d8992e$0$58830$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <oblmqd-bd8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <58d97b7b$0$49904$b1db1813$145976f0@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 3/27/2017 1:42 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/26/2017 05:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> richard@microscitech.com wrote:
>>>>> Beware of the hype...
>>>>>
>>>>> I frequently read phys.org, but is it me, or is the hype on robotics and, especially, driverless cars, going stratospheric?
>>>>>
>>>>> As regards robotics: I do not have or see anything nearing that will
>>>>> vacuum my house in any way.
>>>>
>>>> Have you been living in a cave for the past 15 years?
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roomba
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_domestic_robots
>>>
>>> I take it that your science knowledge comes only out of TV programs and
>>> magazines and certainly not quality ones like Nova or Wired.
>>
>> Ad hominems unrelated to what was posted as would be expected from a troll.
>>
>>> A programmable mobile vacuum cleaner even with sensors and pattern
>>> programming hardly qualifies as a domestic robot that stands at the sink
>>> and does the dishes for you.
>>
>> Why would anyone expect a vacuum cleaner to do the dishes or anything other
>> than vacuum the floor kook?
>>
>> Or is this just more troll irrelevant nonsense?
>>
>> <snip remaining troll nonsense>
> 
> Chimp your amazing ignorance simply defies credulity even after 
> witnessing the senile babblings of Bert as setting the standard.

Usual useless troll ad hominems.

> Where did you spend your life? In a cave or was it in goverment service? 
> Clearly it was in isolation from the real world. I'm SURE you are old 
> enough to have seen the idiot Lib ramblings in popular mags blindly 
> predicting anthropomorphic robots in the future that will be in every 
> house doing all the housework. Such fantasies are obviously as insane as 
> those of HVAC and you.

Typical semi-coherent troll babble and ad hominems irrelevant to the
original statement.

> What is psychologically interesting is that the more ignorant you are 
> and the less comprehension you have of a subject the MORE you become 
> convinced that everyone else is babbling nonsense! You are truly an 
> interesting case! As Bert would Say: WOW!

Yet more useless troll ad hominems.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-03-26 12:01 -0700
  Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-26 21:43 +0000
    Re: Beware of the hype benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:46 -0400
      Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-27 05:42 +0000
        Re: Beware of the hype benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 16:52 -0400
          Re: Beware of the hype jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
  Re: Beware of the hype Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 19:00 -0500
  Re: Beware of the hype Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 03:17 -0400
    Re: Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-03-31 14:10 -0700
      Re: Beware of the hype noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 22:22 -0700
      Re: Beware of the hype richard@microscitech.com - 2017-04-07 12:58 -0700

csiph-web