Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #105379

Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls

From Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls
Date 2017-03-04 19:29 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <o9eq07$hok$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <o9e922$k6i$1@dont-email.me> <o9ebt1$11e$1@dont-email.me> <9cee2215-623c-8657-56e2-2716ed08a198@gmail.com> <o9eigt$o0v$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/4/17 17:23, David Brown wrote:
> On 04/03/17 13:34, Alla wrote:
>> On 3/4/17 15:30, David Brown wrote:
>
>>>
>>> A good place to look would be the Wikipedia article - which looks like
>>> the source for your lecturer's example!
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_buffer_overflow>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are many other websites that explain the basic idea (though it is
>>> not always easy to guess which websites might give a good explanation).
>>>
>>> <https://arstechnica.com/security/2015/08/how-security-flaws-work-the-buffer-overflow/>
>>>
>>>
>> Thank you very much. I will study these materials. Indeed, web is
>> inundated with different explanations, but I would rather come here for
>> advises and help because I trust this community.
>>
>
> I don't mean you should not ask here - merely that there is little need
> for people here to spend time explaining something that is quite well
> explained on sites like these.  Once you have read these pages, if there
> is something that you don't understand, don't agree with, or you want
> more detail, then it makes sense to come back here.  Of course, people
> here might not know relevant details - after all, it's all undefined
> behaviour in C :-)
>
>
Offtopic: secret message :-)
I think I found my mistake :-) I hope!

Respectfully,

Alla

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 14:40 +0300
  Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-04 03:53 -0800
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 14:58 +0300
      Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-03-04 04:04 -0800
        Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 15:12 +0300
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 00:41 -0800
  Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-04 13:30 +0100
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 15:34 +0300
      Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-04 15:23 +0100
        Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 18:22 +0300
          Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 07:53 -0800
        Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 19:29 +0300
  Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-04 11:18 -0500
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 20:10 +0300
      Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-04 13:18 -0500
        Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 22:43 +0300
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-04 14:33 -0800
      Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-05 11:50 +1300
        Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-05 11:12 -0800
          Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-06 17:11 +1300
            Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-03-06 07:23 -0800
              Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-06 17:22 +0100
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-06 16:40 +0000
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls jm.bourguet@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 09:04 -0800
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-06 17:18 +0000
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-03-06 11:22 -0700
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 09:58 -0800
                Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 10:04 -0800
  Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2017-03-04 09:33 -0800
    Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Alla <vitale.alla@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 22:46 +0300
  Re: Stackoverflow, and how C uses stack to remember function calls Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-04 12:25 -0800

csiph-web