Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #618422

Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless
Date 2017-02-13 07:41 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <o7sd1g$7kv$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <dec8eba4-6ccd-4cd5-b65c-6bc2058f3924@googlegroups.com> <o7l2ju$d8b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <2a4f8d53-3055-44fc-b25f-4743e98ad052@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/12/2017 6:19 PM, larryadams717@comcast.net wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 11:00:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Larry A wrote:
>>> The "relativistic" propagation of light means the speed of light is relative to the motion of the source (i.e., not a constant at all!)
>>
>> I don't believe this is accurate. How did you arrive at this conclusion?
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> The book by Wallace Kantor refutes SR and GR. The Newtonian law for the addition of velocities is c + v. Kantor provides
> experimental evidence for this. Galilean Electrodynamics also confirms this.
>
> Einstein's constant speed of light -postulate- was exactly that: an arbitrary definition which has been disproved. Not only
> by Kantor, but by Barry Setterfield, in 1987, as reported by another scientist, Dr. Lambert Dolphin, then at SRI (Stanford
> Research Institute) in Menlo Park, California.
>

Your response has nothing whatsoever to do with my question.
Did you just write something incorrect to open the door to yourself to 
mention these other things?


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-10 10:49 -0800
  Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 13:00 -0600
    Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 19:58 -0800
    Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-12 16:19 -0800
      covariance (x,y) e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:42 -0800
      Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 07:41 -0600
        Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 07:35 -0800
      Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 10:20 -0800
  Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-12 16:14 -0800
    Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 00:31 -0800
  Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-13 12:59 -0800
    Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 10:06 -0800
      Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 12:37 -0800
      Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-16 13:27 -0800
        Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-16 13:31 -0800
          Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 16:17 -0800
        Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-16 21:37 -0800
          covariant par of variables, say, moranges N mapples noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 10:36 -0800
          Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-17 17:31 -0800
            Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-17 19:38 -0800
              Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 09:13 -0800
              Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-19 14:27 -0800
                Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 20:53 -0800
                Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-02-20 09:13 -0800
                Re: Relativistic Covariance is Meaningless larryadams717@comcast.net - 2017-02-20 19:38 -0800
                covariance is only pertaining to a pair covaying variables (in the plane e.g) thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-02-20 22:20 -0800

csiph-web