Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #618094
| From | "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. |
| Date | 2017-02-11 17:31 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <o7nhpi01u9o@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4c47aa43-6b1e-40bb-af57-1e31e4490a16@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.11--8.28A.Seattle.2017> <o7nenu02ede@news4.newsguy.com> <djgu9c9salv1ra7t53bpjdttp2e40mtbbs@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:02:58 -0500, Wally W. wrote: > > The results may not be knowable if the process is deterministic, but > that doesn't make the results "random." > Yes, it does. The results are indistinguishable from what we define as randomness. > > Unlike quantum mechanics, where there is a nonzero probability that a > baseball thrown in New York will arrive on Mars, > You are an idiot that doesn't understand mathematics. The probability decay in QM is exponential. The value of the wave amplitude on Mars would be on the order of 1E-1000000000000000 (i.e. 10^-10000000000000000) which to all beings except an idiot is equal to ZERO. > > there is zero > probability that the motion of a double pendulum will unexpectedly > trace a portion of its path through the atmosphere of Mars. > Again, the muttering of a total idiot. If we sample the phase space trajectory of a double (or triple, or ...) at uniform intervals we will obtain perfectly "random" results. You are WAY out of your league, idiot.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Time is not a dimension alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 06:36 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-10 08:54 -0600
corelations noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 09:17 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-10 14:32 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 19:50 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-12 13:32 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 15:28 -0800
Re: Time is not a dimension "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-10 16:35 -0800
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 16:39 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-02-11 12:02 -0500
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 17:31 +0000
time is not a dimension (counting is mensuration; measuring is measurement) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:15 -0800
Re: time is not a dimension (counting is mensuration; measuring is measurement) "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 13:33 -0800
Re: time is not a dimension (counting is mensuration; measuring is measurement) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 16:27 -0800
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:14 +0100
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-02-11 18:27 -0500
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 23:59 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-02-12 13:32 -0500
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-12 19:24 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 13:40 -0700
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-02-12 18:55 -0500
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 13:39 -0700
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-02-12 19:01 -0500
Re: People _spin it; i.e. they lie, lie, lie. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 19:39 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 17:22 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 19:13 +0100
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:19 -0800
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-02-11 19:04 +0000
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 11:17 -0800
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:53 +0100
Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 21:17 +0100
time is not a dimesnsionality per se noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:02 -0800
csiph-web