Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #103458
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization |
| Date | 2017-02-08 14:20 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o7f5qr$4de$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <o7co5c$hde$1@dont-email.me> <6251ccf7-90b9-48b2-a6e8-251f8d4513f6@googlegroups.com> <532280d0-6b9c-4570-af80-b37c48eedcd6@googlegroups.com> <o7elee$enn$1@dont-email.me> <0cd4f473-3e5b-4670-a457-ed0b3d3f6cc9@googlegroups.com> |
On 08/02/17 12:14, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > David Brown wrote: >> The other way to think about this is that it makes sense to learn >> more about programming languages, programming language design, >> and programming language implementation before making your >> own language and tools. That way you don't have to re-invent the >> wheel all the time, and you can benefit from other people's experiences > > I purposefully stay away from such formal learning because it > maintains my unique perspective which, coupled to my creativity, > has produced some really great features thus far. I'm actually quite > stunned I've been able to do what I have done. But, as I've said, it's > not me. These thoughts pop into my head fully formed. I rarely have > to "think through" any of them. > > If I learned more about languages, I might pigeonhole my own > internal vision. And I have another reason I won't share publicly. I can appreciate that you might feel that learning more about what others have done might affect your creativity and the directions you might take. It will affect them positively, for the most part - but perhaps sometimes negatively. There is a balance to be found. (As for your "hidden" reason - it's entirely up to you to decide its importance.) However, it is regularly clear to me that ideas that "stun" you are not usually very impressive to others with a bit more understanding of programming language history and concepts, and that most of your ideas are very far from "fully formed". (Other things, such as your enthusiasm, energy, and ambition are more impressive or "stunning", as are your abilities to learn new ideas and fields of study.) If you were more open to external ideas, suggestions, and (constructive) criticism then I think you would get on far better. Accept that some of your ideas are good, but some are bad. Some are new, some have been thought of long ago. Some are inspired, some are obvious. And accept that there is /nothing/ that you can think of, or that "springs into your mind", that cannot be improved by discussing it with others - that way you will let your ideas be improved by discussion, instead of always trying to defend them as though you had already decided on the "best" way to do things. > > I've really only thought as I am doing now in the last few years. And > in that time I've come up with a lot on my own. I look forward to seeing > what the future holds as my labor is producing maturing tools, and > more necessary foundation. > > Thank you, > Rick C. Hodgin >
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 06:34 -0800
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-07 16:14 +0100
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 07:22 -0800
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 07:30 -0800
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-08 09:40 +0100
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 03:14 -0800
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-08 14:20 +0100
Re: Instrumenting binaries with meta-gatherers for subsequent recompilation optimization "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 05:24 -0800
csiph-web