Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #48613
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case |
| Date | 2017-02-07 09:22 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o7c00v$qke$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <UAPlA.210290$sc6.108277@fx25.am4> <o79rp3$1jh0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <_I6mA.570101$Zf5.376281@fx41.am4> <o7b2ih$1mvi$1@gioia.aioe.org> <PK8mA.722159$Ww5.170172@fx42.am4> |
On 07/02/17 01:43, JiiPee wrote: > On 06/02/2017 23:58, Manfred wrote: >> In the average example() I would explicitly throw an exception if the >> set is empty, I would not execute the division by zero, or anyway >> assume that the division itsels throws an exception. > > > what if the average is calculated 10 million times per second? would you > still ldo the check eatch time? > > But isnt it this a similar issue to vectors v.at(2) against v[2]? > Do you prefer correct code, or code that is a fraction of a percent faster but wrong? It is really quite simple, and I cannot understand why you are taking so long to get the hang of it. Let me give you the /one/ rule that actually matters: * Do not divide by zero - it is a mistake in the code. * OK? Now you have that as a rule, you can decide the best way to be sure that the rule is not broken. That will depend on the circumstances - what code you have, who is going to call the code, who might make the mistake of threatening a division by zero, and what you can do about it. Options include everything from ignoring it (because if some moron calls your function with an empty set, it is /their/ fault - and you don't want to slow down the code for competent users), returning fixed values, throwing an exception, up to automatically sending out an email to the developers with a deviation report. The same applies to /all/ other undefined behaviour in the code (such as accessing an array out of bounds) and all other kinds of errors. Your target is to avoid them happening. If you think an error /might/ happen, then you find ways to detect the situation and deal with it as best you can.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-11 18:17 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 20:00 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-11 19:16 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 10:36 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 13:16 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 15:23 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:13 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 17:35 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:27 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 17:37 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:44 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:46 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-13 12:06 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-13 11:36 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-13 13:12 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-13 13:11 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-13 15:23 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-13 14:57 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-13 17:35 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-13 20:25 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-14 18:08 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 20:30 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-15 00:16 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-15 01:01 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-15 16:57 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-15 17:17 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-15 19:13 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:48 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:51 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Manfred <mx2927@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 01:08 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-06 00:39 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 00:50 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 02:01 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2017-02-06 13:56 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-06 22:25 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-06 22:26 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-06 16:46 -0600
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 23:49 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-02-07 13:24 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Manfred <mx2927@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 00:58 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-07 00:43 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-07 09:22 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-07 14:06 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-07 15:58 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2017-02-07 01:00 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2017-02-07 15:31 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-02-07 13:22 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 13:20 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 15:28 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 15:40 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-12 16:52 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2017-01-11 23:20 +0100
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2017-01-11 21:43 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 19:12 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 00:07 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 00:12 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2017-01-12 12:55 -0400
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-12 16:53 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2017-01-12 19:10 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-13 15:34 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-14 00:14 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-13 16:56 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-13 17:46 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-14 01:51 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-13 18:09 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 11:21 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-14 12:45 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-01-14 21:02 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-14 13:47 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-14 13:03 -0800
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 07:56 -0500
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-02-05 10:21 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-05 13:33 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-06 07:33 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2017-02-05 13:34 +0000
Re: Best way to handle mathematical divide-by-zero case Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-02-05 18:51 +0000
csiph-web