Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403859
| From | Python <python@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 |
| Date | 2017-01-03 12:10 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o4g0qe$1gmd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <8a22a969-af22-443f-894f-863b91c528e3@googlegroups.com> <b9e6b4df-d195-47a2-bedc-e6069deb1c4c@googlegroups.com> <o4bnpt$19v0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o4cvfe$eap$1@dont-email.me> <o4e6ra$uaa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Le 02/01/2017 à 19:40, Dirk Van de moortel a écrit : > Op 02-jan-2017 om 08:30 schreef Poutnik: >> Dne 01/01/2017 v 21:11 Dirk Van de moortel napsal(a): >>> Op 01-jan-2017 om 20:34 schreef Pentcho Valev: >>>> Einsteinans against climatologists: >>>> >>>> http://motls.blogspot.fr/2017/01/lindzen-me-us-climate-science-needs-to.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Lubos Motl: "Just like we often say that communism cannot be >>>> reformed, the same is true for the real-world composition of the >>>> climate science community today. It just cannot be reformed. Most of >>>> the new people were selected on the basis that they're either stupid >>>> or politically obsessed to repeat Al Gore's and similar junk about >>>> climate catastrophes. They're just bad material, rotten apples. You >>>> can't "fix" them. And I think that even if you could miraculously fix >>>> them and make most of the climatologists honest, it would be morally >>>> nice but still pretty much worthless from the viewpoint of science. >>>> Science just doesn't need this many climatologists." >>> >>> What science needs is irrelevant in this context. >>> This many climatologists are needed by the PLANET. >>> Never heard of this Motl, but he sounds like an idiot. >>> >>> Dirk Vdm >> >> He is a well known czech physicist. >> >> But making statements out of region of expertise >> is not always a good idea. >> > > Sometimes it is, but obviously not here. > Happy 2017 :-) He was once a supporter of the (in)famous Bogdanov Brothers, this says a lot... Happy 2017 too.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-31 02:24 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 06:07 +1100
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 11:34 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-01 21:11 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 14:04 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 09:48 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-02 01:18 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-02 12:23 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:28 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 12:08 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 22:17 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-03 14:47 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 08:30 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:40 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:10 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 19:06 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 03:52 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:35 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 05:42 -0800
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 03:10 -0800
csiph-web