Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403812

Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016

From	Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016
Date	2017-01-02 20:29 +0000
Organization	Demetrice Barren Institute
Message-ID	<o4ed7d$19op$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <o4bnpt$19v0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <24ae098a-2dfb-43e9-87d4-ccedb73a5fe5@googlegroups.com> <ectoc8F5heuU2@mid.individual.net> <o4e64o$t5i$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0ec7ca64-229a-4bce-9eea-900bcfd21657@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Pentcho Valev wrote:

> On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 7:28:45 PM UTC+1, Dirk Van de moortel
> wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe I said something interesting--to him. But he called me clever, so
>> I have my doubts.
> 
> Once you were interestingly cynical, clever Moortel, so I am always
> inclined to pay you some more attention (good old days, you know). As
> for "clever", that used to be irony but now it is just a matter of
> habit. Pentcho Valev

I disagree. He is clever, but NOT in my Divergent Matter. He knows nothing 
about the Divergent Matter Model. In Tensors, yes, he is clever. However 
not sufficient in DMM.

Thread

The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-31 02:24 -0800
  Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 06:07 +1100
  The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 11:34 -0800
    Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-01 21:11 +0100
      Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 14:04 -0800
        Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 09:48 +1100
          Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-02 01:18 +0000
        Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-02 12:23 +1100
          Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:28 +0100
            Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 12:08 -0800
              Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 20:29 +0000
          Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 22:17 +0100
            Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-03 14:47 +1100
      Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 08:30 +0100
        Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:40 +0100
          Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:10 +0100
        Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 19:06 +0000
      Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 03:52 -0800
        Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:35 +0100
          Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 05:42 -0800
    The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 03:10 -0800

csiph-web