Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403742
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 |
| Date | 2017-01-02 09:48 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o4c10p$1o4l$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <8a22a969-af22-443f-894f-863b91c528e3@googlegroups.com> <b9e6b4df-d195-47a2-bedc-e6069deb1c4c@googlegroups.com> <o4bnpt$19v0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <24ae098a-2dfb-43e9-87d4-ccedb73a5fe5@googlegroups.com> |
On 02/01/17 09:04, Pentcho Valev wrote: > On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 9:11:46 PM UTC+1, Dirk Van de moortel > wrote: >> >> Never heard of this Motl, but he sounds like an idiot. > > All Einsteinians sound like idiots, clever Moortel: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/Y7KQjUSdum0/1rvrcjF4JlMJ > > Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring instrument." > > Pentcho Valev Roberts has trained his pet monkey to randomly join a few obscure scientific terms together and then post them off to sci.physics.relativity. --
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-31 02:24 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 06:07 +1100
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 11:34 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-01 21:11 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-01 14:04 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 09:48 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-02 01:18 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-02 12:23 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:28 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 12:08 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 22:17 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-03 14:47 +1100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 08:30 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:40 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:10 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2017-01-02 19:06 +0000
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 03:52 -0800
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-01-02 19:35 +0100
Re: The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 05:42 -0800
The Biggest Physics Breakthrough of 2016 Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-02 03:10 -0800
csiph-web